東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The effect of patient simulation on ...

Becker, Deborah Ellen.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The effect of patient simulation on the critical thinking of advanced practice nursing students.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The effect of patient simulation on the critical thinking of advanced practice nursing students./
作者:	Becker, Deborah Ellen.
面頁冊數:	135 p.
附註:	Adviser: Fredricka Reisman.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-04B.
標題:	Health Sciences, Education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3259372

The effect of patient simulation on the critical thinking of advanced practice nursing students.
Becker, Deborah Ellen.

The effect of patient simulation on the critical thinking of advanced practice nursing students. - 135 p.

Adviser: Fredricka Reisman.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Drexel University, 2007.

Nurse educators attempt to develop critical thinking of nursing students through a variety of instructional methods because they are unable to prepare students for every situation they may encounter. Problem-based learning is the traditional method used. Case analyses conducted in classroom settings have yielded varied results. Recent reports hail high fidelity, patient simulators as an effective tool to enhance critical thinking however, little empirical data exists to support these claims. The current study set out to examine the effect patient simulation has on the critical thinking of nurse practitioner and nurse anesthesia students. Case analysis sessions conducted in the face-to-face format were compared to those sessions conducted around a patient simulator. Participants completed the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST), which includes subscale scores for induction, inference and analysis, to establish a baseline measure of their critical thinking. Participants were then randomly assigned to either format and further randomly assigned to complete one of two cases. All sessions were videotaped and behaviors and discussion were coded using a scoring tool based on Garrison's Stages of Critical Thinking. According to Garrison's Five Stages of Critical Thinking, individuals are said predominantly to use the elements of induction, inference and analysis in the planning phase. Data analysis revealed patient simulation to increase critical thinking during the management planning and evaluation stages. The current study has provided additional empirical evidence supporting the use of simulation during problem-based learning, case analysis to enhance critical thinking, especially during management planning when advanced practice, nursing students formulate creative solutions to the problem, link ideas and make assumptions. Critical thinking was also increased during the evaluation stage when decision-making is a large component and includes an evaluation of progress and mistakes made and a determination of what more must be done. By enhancing critical thinking in these two stages, APNs can be better prepared to evaluate and solve the problems faced in clinical practice leading to better patient outcomes.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017921
Health Sciences, Education.

The effect of patient simulation on the critical thinking of advanced practice nursing students.
LDR:03123nam 2200265 a 45 001 962588
005 20110830
008 110831s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI3259372
035 $a AAI3259372
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Becker, Deborah Ellen. $3 1285648
245 1 4 $a The effect of patient simulation on the critical thinking of advanced practice nursing students.
300 $a 135 p.
500 $a Adviser: Fredricka Reisman.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-04, Section: B, page: 2221.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Drexel University, 2007.
520 $a Nurse educators attempt to develop critical thinking of nursing students through a variety of instructional methods because they are unable to prepare students for every situation they may encounter. Problem-based learning is the traditional method used. Case analyses conducted in classroom settings have yielded varied results. Recent reports hail high fidelity, patient simulators as an effective tool to enhance critical thinking however, little empirical data exists to support these claims. The current study set out to examine the effect patient simulation has on the critical thinking of nurse practitioner and nurse anesthesia students. Case analysis sessions conducted in the face-to-face format were compared to those sessions conducted around a patient simulator. Participants completed the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST), which includes subscale scores for induction, inference and analysis, to establish a baseline measure of their critical thinking. Participants were then randomly assigned to either format and further randomly assigned to complete one of two cases. All sessions were videotaped and behaviors and discussion were coded using a scoring tool based on Garrison's Stages of Critical Thinking. According to Garrison's Five Stages of Critical Thinking, individuals are said predominantly to use the elements of induction, inference and analysis in the planning phase. Data analysis revealed patient simulation to increase critical thinking during the management planning and evaluation stages. The current study has provided additional empirical evidence supporting the use of simulation during problem-based learning, case analysis to enhance critical thinking, especially during management planning when advanced practice, nursing students formulate creative solutions to the problem, link ideas and make assumptions. Critical thinking was also increased during the evaluation stage when decision-making is a large component and includes an evaluation of progress and mistakes made and a determination of what more must be done. By enhancing critical thinking in these two stages, APNs can be better prepared to evaluate and solve the problems faced in clinical practice leading to better patient outcomes.
590 $a School code: 0065.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Education. $3 1017921
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Nursing. $3 1017798
690 $a 0350
690 $a 0569
710 2 $a Drexel University. $3 1018434
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-04B.
790 $a 0065
790 1 0 $a Reisman, Fredricka, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3259372