東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

One foot in: Student-athlete advocac...

Broussard, William James.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

One foot in: Student-athlete advocacy and social movement rhetoric in the margins of American college athletics.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	One foot in: Student-athlete advocacy and social movement rhetoric in the margins of American college athletics./
作者:	Broussard, William James.
面頁冊數:	229 p.
附註:	Adviser: Roxanne Mountford.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-03A.
標題:	Black Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3255666

One foot in: Student-athlete advocacy and social movement rhetoric in the margins of American college athletics.
Broussard, William James.

One foot in: Student-athlete advocacy and social movement rhetoric in the margins of American college athletics. - 229 p.

Adviser: Roxanne Mountford.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2007.

In "One Foot In: Student-Athlete Advocacy and Social Movement Rhetoric in the Margins of American College Athletics," the author explores student-athlete advocacy of black male student-athletes in revenue generating sports and educational and cultural reforms to NCAA policies and bylaws over approximately two decades (1985-2006). The author examines non-profit organizations---Black Coaches Association, Drake Group, Institute for Diversity and Ethics and Sport, and Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics---who pressured the NCAA to enact measures to restore order and balance to American college athletics. In addition, these measures are designed to increase student-athlete graduation rates, increase opportunities for minority coaches and administrators, and protect college educators who blow the whistle on institutions who commit infractions. The author begins by identifying social movement rhetorical strategies---the "Triple Front" strategy of Harold Cruse and Agitation/Control Rhetoric of Bowers, Ochs, and Jensen---to analyze rhetorical interactions between non-profit organizations and the NCAA, especially how the NCAA responds by using control rhetoric in order to protect itself from outside influences. Finally, the author ends the discussion by using autoethnography to analyze my own experiences as a writing program administrator challenging NCAA hegemony by running a progressive writing program within a traditional student-athlete study hall.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017673
Black Studies.

One foot in: Student-athlete advocacy and social movement rhetoric in the margins of American college athletics.
LDR:02412nam 2200289 a 45 001 955069
005 20110622
008 110622s2007 eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI3255666
035 $a AAI3255666
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Broussard, William James. $3 1278528
245 1 0 $a One foot in: Student-athlete advocacy and social movement rhetoric in the margins of American college athletics.
300 $a 229 p.
500 $a Adviser: Roxanne Mountford.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-03, Section: A, page: 0984.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2007.
520 $a In "One Foot In: Student-Athlete Advocacy and Social Movement Rhetoric in the Margins of American College Athletics," the author explores student-athlete advocacy of black male student-athletes in revenue generating sports and educational and cultural reforms to NCAA policies and bylaws over approximately two decades (1985-2006). The author examines non-profit organizations---Black Coaches Association, Drake Group, Institute for Diversity and Ethics and Sport, and Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics---who pressured the NCAA to enact measures to restore order and balance to American college athletics. In addition, these measures are designed to increase student-athlete graduation rates, increase opportunities for minority coaches and administrators, and protect college educators who blow the whistle on institutions who commit infractions. The author begins by identifying social movement rhetorical strategies---the "Triple Front" strategy of Harold Cruse and Agitation/Control Rhetoric of Bowers, Ochs, and Jensen---to analyze rhetorical interactions between non-profit organizations and the NCAA, especially how the NCAA responds by using control rhetoric in order to protect itself from outside influences. Finally, the author ends the discussion by using autoethnography to analyze my own experiences as a writing program administrator challenging NCAA hegemony by running a progressive writing program within a traditional student-athlete study hall.
590 $a School code: 0009.
650 4 $a Black Studies. $3 1017673
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Language, Rhetoric and Composition. $3 1019205
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 535376
690 $a 0325
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0814
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $3 1017508
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-03A.
790 $a 0009
790 1 0 $a Mountford, Roxanne, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3255666