東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

GIS in education: An examination of...

Doering, Aaron Herbert.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

GIS in education: An examination of pedagogy.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	GIS in education: An examination of pedagogy./
作者:	Doering, Aaron Herbert.
面頁冊數:	135 p.
附註:	Advisers: Simon Richard Hooper; Joan E. Hughes.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-03A.
標題:	Education, Social Sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3083268

GIS in education: An examination of pedagogy.
Doering, Aaron Herbert.

GIS in education: An examination of pedagogy. - 135 p.

Advisers: Simon Richard Hooper; Joan E. Hughes.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2003.

The purpose of this study was to develop and research the effectiveness of three instructional models for geographic information systems (GIS) to be implemented by university-level instructors within preservice teacher education courses. The instructional models, which were “Basics First” (BF), “Structured Problem Solving” (SPS), and “Guided Generation” (GG), used a theoretical framework based on the Jasper Woodbury Problem Solving Series from the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. The participants' abilities to solve an authentic problem using a GIS, their comprehension of GIS procedural skills, and their field articulation was collected and analyzed. A total of 142 preservice teachers were divided into treatments to receive the GIS instruction. The participants' abilities to solve problems with a GIS and their GIS procedural skills were collected immediately after instruction and two weeks later. In addition to the exams, five participants from each treatment were interviewed to better understand their GIS learning and likelihood of future GIS integration.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1019148
Education, Social Sciences.

GIS in education: An examination of pedagogy.
LDR:03429nam 2200325 a 45 001 937576
005 20110511
008 110511s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3083268
035 $a AAI3083268
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Doering, Aaron Herbert. $3 1261438
245 1 0 $a GIS in education: An examination of pedagogy.
300 $a 135 p.
500 $a Advisers: Simon Richard Hooper; Joan E. Hughes.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-03, Section: A, page: 0867.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2003.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to develop and research the effectiveness of three instructional models for geographic information systems (GIS) to be implemented by university-level instructors within preservice teacher education courses. The instructional models, which were “Basics First” (BF), “Structured Problem Solving” (SPS), and “Guided Generation” (GG), used a theoretical framework based on the Jasper Woodbury Problem Solving Series from the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. The participants' abilities to solve an authentic problem using a GIS, their comprehension of GIS procedural skills, and their field articulation was collected and analyzed. A total of 142 preservice teachers were divided into treatments to receive the GIS instruction. The participants' abilities to solve problems with a GIS and their GIS procedural skills were collected immediately after instruction and two weeks later. In addition to the exams, five participants from each treatment were interviewed to better understand their GIS learning and likelihood of future GIS integration.
520 $a Results showed no significant differences between participants based on the instruction they received after completing the immediate cognitive engagement posttest exam. However, the delayed posttest exam given two weeks later, participants who received the BF and SPS instruction performed significantly better than the control group and GG participants. BF and SPS treatments also performed significantly better than the control group and GG participants on the delayed procedural knowledge posttest.
520 $a Interviews revealed participants who received the BF instruction might have performed significantly better because they had access to an instructor at all times when learning the GIS content prior to the exams. Furthermore, participants who received the SPS instruction may have performed significantly better because they had access to videos and structured practice questions where they could see the application of their skills.
520 $a Interviews showed that participants in the control group and GG treatment were frustrated with their instruction, as they could not apply their newly learned skills. The control group and GG participants not only performed significantly worse, but they spent a significantly less amount of time completing the second exam because they gave up. Lastly, field articulation had no significant impact on GIS learning.
590 $a School code: 0130.
650 4 $a Education, Social Sciences. $3 1019148
650 4 $a Education, Technology. $3 1017498
650 4 $a Geography. $3 524010
690 $a 0366
690 $a 0534
690 $a 0710
710 2 0 $a University of Minnesota. $3 676231
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-03A.
790 $a 0130
790 1 0 $a Hooper, Simon Richard, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Hughes, Joan E., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3083268