東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Lingual politics: The syncopated ac...

Miller, Joshua Leon.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Lingual politics: The syncopated accents of multilingual modernism, 1919--1948 (H. L. Mencken).

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Lingual politics: The syncopated accents of multilingual modernism, 1919--1948 (H. L. Mencken)./
作者:	Miller, Joshua Leon.
面頁冊數:	329 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-02, Section: A, page: 0575.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International62-02A.
標題:	Language, Modern. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3005760
ISBN:	0493153152

Lingual politics: The syncopated accents of multilingual modernism, 1919--1948 (H. L. Mencken).
Miller, Joshua Leon.

Lingual politics: The syncopated accents of multilingual modernism, 1919--1948 (H. L. Mencken). - 329 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-02, Section: A, page: 0575.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2001.

Language issues rose to unprecedented prominence in the United States during the interwar era. “English-Only” nativist nationalism during and after World War I attempted to define U.S. identity in terms of language; Americans, according to this logic, were those who spoke “American.” Arguments on behalf of monolingual national identity concealed both racist and nationalist ideologies by replacing racial and ethnic terms with linguistic categories. In response, a wide range of multilingual and multidialect literatures sprang up during the 1920s and 30s to counter the conservative equation of “standard” U.S. English with a mythic racial whiteness. The struggle between monolingual and multilingual modernists opened a wide debate over the contours of U.S. cultural citizenship, the role(s) of literary critics as mediators of culture, and literary modernism itself.

ISBN: 0493153152Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018098
Language, Modern.

Lingual politics: The syncopated accents of multilingual modernism, 1919--1948 (H. L. Mencken).
LDR:03549nam 2200313 a 45 001 935850
005 20110510
008 110510s2001 eng d
020 $a 0493153152
035 $a (UnM)AAI3005760
035 $a AAI3005760
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Miller, Joshua Leon. $3 1259553
245 1 0 $a Lingual politics: The syncopated accents of multilingual modernism, 1919--1948 (H. L. Mencken).
300 $a 329 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-02, Section: A, page: 0575.
500 $a Sponsor: Gauri Viswanathan.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2001.
520 $a Language issues rose to unprecedented prominence in the United States during the interwar era. “English-Only” nativist nationalism during and after World War I attempted to define U.S. identity in terms of language; Americans, according to this logic, were those who spoke “American.” Arguments on behalf of monolingual national identity concealed both racist and nationalist ideologies by replacing racial and ethnic terms with linguistic categories. In response, a wide range of multilingual and multidialect literatures sprang up during the 1920s and 30s to counter the conservative equation of “standard” U.S. English with a mythic racial whiteness. The struggle between monolingual and multilingual modernists opened a wide debate over the contours of U.S. cultural citizenship, the role(s) of literary critics as mediators of culture, and literary modernism itself.
520 $a The English-Only movements and multilingual modernism need to be viewed in dialectical opposition. Interpreting only one of these conjoined trends is unlikely to convey the stakes of this conflict. “Lingual Politics” provides a genealogy of early-twentieth-century monolingualism through an examination of H. L. Mencken's enormously popular book, <italic>The American Language</italic>, which first appeared in 1919. The notion of a rigorously structured national language seized the imagination of the American public during the interwar era. This philological frenzy passed into academia with the rise of linguistics in the 1920s. New journals, textbooks, university departments and programs, grammar manuals, linguistic societies, conferences, and other projects seeking to codify U.S. English during this period sprang up throughout the nation's universities. One of the results of this feverish campaign was that by the 1940s, the status of U.S. English was largely unquestioned, within academia and without.
520 $a In response to the construction of U.S. English as a national “standard” for cultural citizenship, multilingual and multidialect authors theorized trans-ethnic alliances among African-Americans, Jews, Asian Americans, and Latinos. The remarkable flourishing of multilingual literature between the world wars challenged the fictive construction of U.S. English. Authors such as Nella Larsen, Jean Toomer, Zora Neale Hurston, Henry Roth, Americo Paredes, and Carlos Bulosan invented new narrative idioms that expanded the formal aesthetics of modernism to capture the uncomfortable, self-conscious, syncopated beats of multilingual vernacular modernism.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Language, Modern. $3 1018098
650 4 $a Literature, American. $3 1017657
650 4 $a Literature, Modern. $3 624011
690 $a 0291
690 $a 0298
690 $a 0591
710 2 0 $a Columbia University. $3 571054
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 62-02A.
790 $a 0054
790 1 0 $a Viswanathan, Gauri, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3005760