東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Lexical decision tasks in monolingua...

The William Paterson University of New Jersey.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Lexical decision tasks in monolingual vs. bilingual persons.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Lexical decision tasks in monolingual vs. bilingual persons./
作者:	De Trizio, Maria.
面頁冊數:	44 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 47-01, page: 0360.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International47-01.
標題:	Health Sciences, Speech Pathology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=1457850
ISBN:	9780549711483

Lexical decision tasks in monolingual vs. bilingual persons.
De Trizio, Maria.

Lexical decision tasks in monolingual vs. bilingual persons. - 44 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 47-01, page: 0360.

Thesis (M.S.)--The William Paterson University of New Jersey, 2008.

Much research has been conducted on whether bilinguals' cognitive abilities are superior to monolinguals. Recent studies reveal that bilinguals may have an advantage over monolinguals and that they are better able to multi-task and selectively attend, when performing a cognitive task. However, this ability is decreased in the presence of distracters. The current study sought to examine the effect of three types of distracters on the performance of monolinguals and non-balanced bilinguals on a lexical decision task. The researcher hypothesized that when the distracter is in the participants' L1, the participants would respond more slowly and with less accuracy than when the distracter is in their L2 or indecipherable speech due to their ability to selectively attend. Ten subjects were recruited for each group. Computer software was used to carry out the lexical decision task and monitor response times and accuracy rates, which were compared between the two groups. Results indicate that overall, monolinguals respond faster than bilingual. Within group analyses revealed that both groups responded faster when the distracter was in their L1. However, the bilingual group had greater overall accuracy than the monolingual group. Their accuracy was greatest in the presence of noise or in their L2 and least when the distracter was in their L1.

ISBN: 9780549711483Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018105
Health Sciences, Speech Pathology.

Lexical decision tasks in monolingual vs. bilingual persons.
LDR:02152nmm 2200265 a 45 001 874788
005 20100825
008 100825s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549711483
035 $a (UMI)AAI1457850
035 $a AAI1457850
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a De Trizio, Maria. $3 1044102
245 1 0 $a Lexical decision tasks in monolingual vs. bilingual persons.
300 $a 44 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 47-01, page: 0360.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--The William Paterson University of New Jersey, 2008.
520 $a Much research has been conducted on whether bilinguals' cognitive abilities are superior to monolinguals. Recent studies reveal that bilinguals may have an advantage over monolinguals and that they are better able to multi-task and selectively attend, when performing a cognitive task. However, this ability is decreased in the presence of distracters. The current study sought to examine the effect of three types of distracters on the performance of monolinguals and non-balanced bilinguals on a lexical decision task. The researcher hypothesized that when the distracter is in the participants' L1, the participants would respond more slowly and with less accuracy than when the distracter is in their L2 or indecipherable speech due to their ability to selectively attend. Ten subjects were recruited for each group. Computer software was used to carry out the lexical decision task and monitor response times and accuracy rates, which were compared between the two groups. Results indicate that overall, monolinguals respond faster than bilingual. Within group analyses revealed that both groups responded faster when the distracter was in their L1. However, the bilingual group had greater overall accuracy than the monolingual group. Their accuracy was greatest in the presence of noise or in their L2 and least when the distracter was in their L1.
590 $a School code: 0610.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Speech Pathology. $3 1018105
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0460
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a The William Paterson University of New Jersey. $3 1044101
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 47-01.
790 $a 0610
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=1457850