東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Hoelderlin's skeptical horizon: Neg...

University of Washington.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Hoelderlin's skeptical horizon: Negation and the renunciation of dialectical production in "Hyperion".

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Hoelderlin's skeptical horizon: Negation and the renunciation of dialectical production in "Hyperion"./
作者:	Crosetto, John B., III.
面頁冊數:	305 p.
附註:	Chair: Marshall Brown.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International57-12A.
標題:	Literature, Germanic. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9716829
ISBN:	9780591248074

Hoelderlin's skeptical horizon: Negation and the renunciation of dialectical production in "Hyperion".
Crosetto, John B., III.

Hoelderlin's skeptical horizon: Negation and the renunciation of dialectical production in "Hyperion". - 305 p.

Chair: Marshall Brown.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 1996.

The dissertation interprets Holderlin's novel as a response to questions about subjectivity and "Grundsatze" raised within the philosophical circle at Jena. The failure of Reinhold's "Elementarphilosophie," the initial publication of Niethammer's "Philosophisches Journal," and Fichte's early lectures on the "Wissenschaftslehre" establish the historical context in which Holderlin developed his ideas about consciousness. In order to frame the analysis of Hyperion, I also examine Holderlin's reception of the pantheism debate between Jacobi and Mendelssohn as well as the relation of his early theoretical texts to post-Kantian skepticism.

ISBN: 9780591248074Subjects--Topical Terms:

1019072
Literature, Germanic.

Hoelderlin's skeptical horizon: Negation and the renunciation of dialectical production in "Hyperion".
LDR:03395nmm 2200301 a 45 001 867402
005 20100804
008 100804s1996 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780591248074
035 $a (UMI)AAI9716829
035 $a AAI9716829
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Crosetto, John B., III. $3 1036132
245 1 0 $a Hoelderlin's skeptical horizon: Negation and the renunciation of dialectical production in "Hyperion".
300 $a 305 p.
500 $a Chair: Marshall Brown.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-12, Section: A, page: 5168.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 1996.
520 $a The dissertation interprets Holderlin's novel as a response to questions about subjectivity and "Grundsatze" raised within the philosophical circle at Jena. The failure of Reinhold's "Elementarphilosophie," the initial publication of Niethammer's "Philosophisches Journal," and Fichte's early lectures on the "Wissenschaftslehre" establish the historical context in which Holderlin developed his ideas about consciousness. In order to frame the analysis of Hyperion, I also examine Holderlin's reception of the pantheism debate between Jacobi and Mendelssohn as well as the relation of his early theoretical texts to post-Kantian skepticism.
520 $a As a phenomenology of consciousness the novel's reflexive structure is explained by its content. Hyperion's three principal relationships delineate a progressive understanding of the subject's ability to grasp absolutes. Adamas, his mentor, witnesses Hyperion come out of his childhood harmony with nature into self-awareness. Alabanda, his friend and "Gegner," introduces Hyperion to violent opposition. Diotima, his lover, reacquaints him with the possibility of harmonious relation. Though triadic structures like this one suggest ideological closure, Hyperion remains skeptical towards such products of dialectical thought to the end. Only the form in which Hyperion draws his conclusions changes; cynical and dogmatic judgments are replaced by an optimistic statement of paradox (an Aristotelian riddle or impossible combination of words).
520 $a Within the context of Holderlin's modern reception as it is influenced by Heidegger, the final chapter examines how the function of the negative differs in logic and language. Specifically, it looks at the conditions under which a fundamental principle of logic, the principle of contradiction, has transformed from a crucible for truth to a tool for making statements that neither affirm nor deny truth. The concept of negation unifies the three areas of the dissertation: the concern in Jena for the (im)possibility of a first principle of philosophy, the form of Hyperion as a representation of the individual's (in)ability to conceive ideal wholes, and the rhetorical strategies for naming the (im)possible adopted from Heidegger by modern readers of Holderlin. Ultimately, the dissertation proposes a negation based on faith and resignation as an alternative to Hegel's more antagonistic and hence productive idea of negativity that persists in postmodern discourse.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Literature, Germanic. $3 1019072
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
690 $a 0311
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a University of Washington. $3 545923
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 57-12A.
790 $a 0250
790 1 0 $a Brown, Marshall, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1996
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9716829