東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Art criticism in art education: A co...

Porter, Bonnadell M.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Art criticism in art education: A content analysis of twelve years (1980-1992) of art criticism in "The Journal of Studies in Art Education".

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Art criticism in art education: A content analysis of twelve years (1980-1992) of art criticism in "The Journal of Studies in Art Education"./
Author:	Porter, Bonnadell M.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 1993,
Description:	204 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 55-08, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International55-08A.
Subject:	Art education. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9405213
ISBN:	9798208076712

Art criticism in art education: A content analysis of twelve years (1980-1992) of art criticism in "The Journal of Studies in Art Education".
Porter, Bonnadell M.

Art criticism in art education: A content analysis of twelve years (1980-1992) of art criticism in "The Journal of Studies in Art Education". - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 1993 - 204 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 55-08, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 1993.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The proliferation of art criticism approaches in Art Education during the last decade has caused many art educators and students to wonder how best to understand these critical methods while also making aesthetic and historical backgrounds meaningful and intrpretation possible. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze criticism approaches in art education that have emerged in the past twelve years. A selection of proposed approaches to art criticism that were published that were published in The Journal of Studies in Art Education from 1980-1992 were the focus of a theoretical content analysis. The literature review was presented in three parts. the first phase of the review dealt with the historical foundations of art criticism in Art Education including addresses issues of concern in higher education. The second literature content area served to explicate the design focus and outlined the method of content analysis. The third section reviewed the formation of an appropriate analytical construct central to the design of the content analysis. The design of this research was based on content analysis as described by Krippendorff and Carney. An analytical construct of the characteristics of formalism was used to analyze and explicate thirteen articles of approaches to art criticism in Art Education that explore the target question of identifying the changes in Art Education's criticism in the past twelve years. Contingency tables were developed to identify art criticism approaches that were formalistic and art criticism that was different from formalism. At the most general level, it was found that there were three and one-half articles (Unit Number 6 being divided into 6A and 6B) that conformed to the principles of formalism criticism and nine and one-half articles that presented art criticism approaches significantly different from a formalist approach. The art criticism explicated in this research has recognized that art is continuing to evolve in directions that are considerably diversified, producing criticism that is diversified including the background and interest of its writers. These changing critical approaches signal significant paradigm shifts away from formalist art criticism and can be corroborated by considering selected literature from other disciplines. Implications for pedagogical changes and curriculum interest were explored and recommendations made. Art educators and adult students need to be made aware of the paradigm shifts that are occurring and the need for a variety of models that address art criticism.

ISBN: 9798208076712Subjects--Topical Terms:

547650
Art education.

Art criticism in art education: A content analysis of twelve years (1980-1992) of art criticism in "The Journal of Studies in Art Education".
LDR:03815nmm a2200337 4500 001 2396469
005 20240611104258.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s1993 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798208076712
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI9405213
035 $a AAI9405213
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Porter, Bonnadell M. $3 3766162
245 1 0 $a Art criticism in art education: A content analysis of twelve years (1980-1992) of art criticism in "The Journal of Studies in Art Education".
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1993
300 $a 204 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 55-08, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Maitland-Gholson, Jane.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 1993.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a The proliferation of art criticism approaches in Art Education during the last decade has caused many art educators and students to wonder how best to understand these critical methods while also making aesthetic and historical backgrounds meaningful and intrpretation possible. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze criticism approaches in art education that have emerged in the past twelve years. A selection of proposed approaches to art criticism that were published that were published in The Journal of Studies in Art Education from 1980-1992 were the focus of a theoretical content analysis. The literature review was presented in three parts. the first phase of the review dealt with the historical foundations of art criticism in Art Education including addresses issues of concern in higher education. The second literature content area served to explicate the design focus and outlined the method of content analysis. The third section reviewed the formation of an appropriate analytical construct central to the design of the content analysis. The design of this research was based on content analysis as described by Krippendorff and Carney. An analytical construct of the characteristics of formalism was used to analyze and explicate thirteen articles of approaches to art criticism in Art Education that explore the target question of identifying the changes in Art Education's criticism in the past twelve years. Contingency tables were developed to identify art criticism approaches that were formalistic and art criticism that was different from formalism. At the most general level, it was found that there were three and one-half articles (Unit Number 6 being divided into 6A and 6B) that conformed to the principles of formalism criticism and nine and one-half articles that presented art criticism approaches significantly different from a formalist approach. The art criticism explicated in this research has recognized that art is continuing to evolve in directions that are considerably diversified, producing criticism that is diversified including the background and interest of its writers. These changing critical approaches signal significant paradigm shifts away from formalist art criticism and can be corroborated by considering selected literature from other disciplines. Implications for pedagogical changes and curriculum interest were explored and recommendations made. Art educators and adult students need to be made aware of the paradigm shifts that are occurring and the need for a variety of models that address art criticism.
590 $a School code: 0171.
650 4 $a Art education. $3 547650
690 $a 0273
710 2 $a University of Oregon. $3 958250
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 55-08A.
790 $a 0171
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1993
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9405213