東華大學圖書館 |

Applying Learning Theory Principles in the Design of Effective Learning Objects.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Applying Learning Theory Principles in the Design of Effective Learning Objects./
作者:	Guled, Abdiwahab.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (214 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-07A.
標題:	Technology education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30274111click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798357590527

Applying Learning Theory Principles in the Design of Effective Learning Objects.
Guled, Abdiwahab.

Applying Learning Theory Principles in the Design of Effective Learning Objects. - 1 online resource (214 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Dr.Ed.)--Sam Houston State University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

This Design-based research study aimed to develop a design framework that would help learning designers to apply learning theory principles when designing learning objects. The study examined the experiential learning theory, information processing theory, and cognitive load theory to develop the iterative learning development (ILD) model. Several iterations of testing and refinement were conducted throughout the development and implementation of the ILD model.A group of professional learning designers (n=5) tested the ILD model by creating a 3-module exemplary learning object (LO) in collaboration with subject matter experts at Gollis University. Learning designers tested version one of the ILD model by developing module one of the 3-module exemplary learning object. Peer reviewers provided quantitative and qualitative feedback to measure the effectiveness of version one of the ILD model. Module one was then implemented in a real classroom at Gollis University. Students (n = 32) were surveyed, and the instructor was interviewed during the implementation. Feedback from students, the instructor, and peer reviewers was used to develop version two of the ILD model.Version two of the ILD model was tested by creating module two. Several iterations of refinement were conducted during the development and implementation of version two. Student surveys, instructor interviews, and peer reviewer feedback were used to create version three of the ILD model. Finally, version three of the ILD model iv was tested by developing module three of the exemplary learning object. Similarly, several cycles of iterative revisions were conducted throughout the development and implementation of version three. Peer reviewers' feedback and responses from student surveys and instructor interviews were used to refine the effectiveness of the final version of the ILD model (i.e., version three).Findings revealed successive improvements in the effectiveness of the ILD model. Version one did not provide expected guidance to learning designers to apply learning theory principles effectively when designing objects. Module one content contained a higher proportion of extraneous information, misalignment between learning objectives and associated content, and irrelevant multi-media. Version two helped designers improve module two's overall flow and organization. However, there was a lot of extraneous information in the reading content. This means that learning designers did not apply IPT-1/CLT-2 effectively to remove all extraneous information from the content. Finally, version three of the ILD model showed higher performance than previous versions. Using version three, learning designers showed significant progress in removing extraneous information, mapping content with learning objectives, and packaging content into manageable chunks that learning designers can process without feeling cognitive overload. The development and implementation of the experiment continued for 28 weeks.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798357590527Subjects--Topical Terms:

3423978
Technology education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Design-based researchIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Applying Learning Theory Principles in the Design of Effective Learning Objects.
LDR:04689nmm a2200481K 4500 001 2355842
005 20230523083447.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798357590527
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30274111
035 $a (MiAaPQ)0374vireo789Guled
035 $a AAI30274111
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Guled, Abdiwahab. $3 3696298
245 1 0 $a Applying Learning Theory Principles in the Design of Effective Learning Objects.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (214 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Song, Donggil ; Angrove, William.
502 $a Thesis (Dr.Ed.)--Sam Houston State University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This Design-based research study aimed to develop a design framework that would help learning designers to apply learning theory principles when designing learning objects. The study examined the experiential learning theory, information processing theory, and cognitive load theory to develop the iterative learning development (ILD) model. Several iterations of testing and refinement were conducted throughout the development and implementation of the ILD model.A group of professional learning designers (n=5) tested the ILD model by creating a 3-module exemplary learning object (LO) in collaboration with subject matter experts at Gollis University. Learning designers tested version one of the ILD model by developing module one of the 3-module exemplary learning object. Peer reviewers provided quantitative and qualitative feedback to measure the effectiveness of version one of the ILD model. Module one was then implemented in a real classroom at Gollis University. Students (n = 32) were surveyed, and the instructor was interviewed during the implementation. Feedback from students, the instructor, and peer reviewers was used to develop version two of the ILD model.Version two of the ILD model was tested by creating module two. Several iterations of refinement were conducted during the development and implementation of version two. Student surveys, instructor interviews, and peer reviewer feedback were used to create version three of the ILD model. Finally, version three of the ILD model iv was tested by developing module three of the exemplary learning object. Similarly, several cycles of iterative revisions were conducted throughout the development and implementation of version three. Peer reviewers' feedback and responses from student surveys and instructor interviews were used to refine the effectiveness of the final version of the ILD model (i.e., version three).Findings revealed successive improvements in the effectiveness of the ILD model. Version one did not provide expected guidance to learning designers to apply learning theory principles effectively when designing objects. Module one content contained a higher proportion of extraneous information, misalignment between learning objectives and associated content, and irrelevant multi-media. Version two helped designers improve module two's overall flow and organization. However, there was a lot of extraneous information in the reading content. This means that learning designers did not apply IPT-1/CLT-2 effectively to remove all extraneous information from the content. Finally, version three of the ILD model showed higher performance than previous versions. Using version three, learning designers showed significant progress in removing extraneous information, mapping content with learning objectives, and packaging content into manageable chunks that learning designers can process without feeling cognitive overload. The development and implementation of the experiment continued for 28 weeks.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Technology education. $3 3423978
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
653 $a Design-based research
653 $a Passive learning
653 $a Active learning
653 $a Concrete experience
653 $a Reflective observation
653 $a Abstract conceptualization
653 $a Experimentation
653 $a Learning objects and objectives
653 $a Cognitive load
653 $a Extraneous load
653 $a Germane load
653 $a Experimental learning
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0727
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Sam Houston State University. $b Library of Science and Technology. $3 3696299
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-07A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30274111 $z click for full text (PQDT)