語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
The Learning Experiences of Students in a Face-To-Face Learning Environment Compared to an Online Learning Environment.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
The Learning Experiences of Students in a Face-To-Face Learning Environment Compared to an Online Learning Environment./
作者:
Gatlin, Julie Anne.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (133 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International82-10A.
標題:
Technology education. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28390779click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9798569984855
The Learning Experiences of Students in a Face-To-Face Learning Environment Compared to an Online Learning Environment.
Gatlin, Julie Anne.
The Learning Experiences of Students in a Face-To-Face Learning Environment Compared to an Online Learning Environment.
- 1 online resource (133 pages)
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.
Thesis (Ed.D.)--Sam Houston State University, 2020.
Includes bibliographical references
The purpose of this study was to explore high school students' and teachers' experiences and perceptions of effective online learning compared to a face-to-face learning environment. A great deal of evidence exists showing that no significant difference should be expected regarding a well-designed online learning environment compared with well-designed in-person learning environment (Clark, 1983). Significant differences still exist in the way students perceive their online experiences during learning (Paul & Jefferson, 2019). Districts offer online courses because it is considered to be more cost-effective. For example, online courses allow districts to eliminate the need for additional physical space (Krafcik 2010; Olster, 2010).This was a mixed methods study that included a single subject case study that examined the experiences and perceptions of one high school teacher. Data instruments include a student survey using a 5-point Likert Scale that measures teacher presence, social presence, and cognitive presence. A teacher survey consisted of ten open-ended questions on the planning and delivery of the online course and traditional face-to-face course. The survey aligns with student responses from interviews and focus group discussions. The researcher was the primary instrument for data collection and analysis. This study pointed out important differences in the student-teacher relationship between online and face-to-face instruction. It was concluded that important differences between the two modalities were found regarding the teachers' perceptions of the students and regarding ways that the teacher and students communicated. These findings deepen the understanding of the teacher-student relationship in online learning, as compared to face-to-face learning. These findings could assist in thinking of ways to promote better student-teacher relationships in online teaching.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9798569984855Subjects--Topical Terms:
3423978
Technology education.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Online learning environmentIndex Terms--Genre/Form:
542853
Electronic books.
The Learning Experiences of Students in a Face-To-Face Learning Environment Compared to an Online Learning Environment.
LDR
:03516nmm a2200433K 4500
001
2355752
005
20230523083423.5
006
m o d
007
cr mn ---uuuuu
008
241011s2020 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9798569984855
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28390779
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)0374vireo554Gatlin
035
$a
AAI28390779
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Gatlin, Julie Anne.
$3
3696196
245
1 4
$a
The Learning Experiences of Students in a Face-To-Face Learning Environment Compared to an Online Learning Environment.
264
0
$c
2020
300
$a
1 online resource (133 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-10, Section: A.
500
$a
Advisor: Edgington, William ; Nerren, Jannah.
502
$a
Thesis (Ed.D.)--Sam Houston State University, 2020.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
The purpose of this study was to explore high school students' and teachers' experiences and perceptions of effective online learning compared to a face-to-face learning environment. A great deal of evidence exists showing that no significant difference should be expected regarding a well-designed online learning environment compared with well-designed in-person learning environment (Clark, 1983). Significant differences still exist in the way students perceive their online experiences during learning (Paul & Jefferson, 2019). Districts offer online courses because it is considered to be more cost-effective. For example, online courses allow districts to eliminate the need for additional physical space (Krafcik 2010; Olster, 2010).This was a mixed methods study that included a single subject case study that examined the experiences and perceptions of one high school teacher. Data instruments include a student survey using a 5-point Likert Scale that measures teacher presence, social presence, and cognitive presence. A teacher survey consisted of ten open-ended questions on the planning and delivery of the online course and traditional face-to-face course. The survey aligns with student responses from interviews and focus group discussions. The researcher was the primary instrument for data collection and analysis. This study pointed out important differences in the student-teacher relationship between online and face-to-face instruction. It was concluded that important differences between the two modalities were found regarding the teachers' perceptions of the students and regarding ways that the teacher and students communicated. These findings deepen the understanding of the teacher-student relationship in online learning, as compared to face-to-face learning. These findings could assist in thinking of ways to promote better student-teacher relationships in online teaching.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2023
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Technology education.
$3
3423978
650
4
$a
Educational evaluation.
$3
526425
650
4
$a
Educational technology.
$3
517670
653
$a
Online learning environment
653
$a
Face-to-face learning environment
653
$a
Learning management system
653
$a
Teacher presence
653
$a
Social presence
653
$a
Cognitive presence
653
$a
Student perception
653
$a
Teacher perception
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
lcsh
$3
542853
690
$a
0710
690
$a
0443
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
783688
710
2
$a
Sam Houston State University.
$b
Library Science.
$3
3563627
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
82-10A.
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28390779
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9478108
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入