東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Exploration of Two Community Advisory Boards within Community Engagement Centers at Institutions of Higher Education.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An Exploration of Two Community Advisory Boards within Community Engagement Centers at Institutions of Higher Education./
作者:	Cannon, Elizabeth.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (188 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-02A.
標題:	Higher education administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29064553click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798837521928

An Exploration of Two Community Advisory Boards within Community Engagement Centers at Institutions of Higher Education.
Cannon, Elizabeth.

An Exploration of Two Community Advisory Boards within Community Engagement Centers at Institutions of Higher Education. - 1 online resource (188 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Civic engagement has become an important part of the educational landscape at institutions of higher education in the United States. The development of mutually-beneficial community-university partnerships has become a common interest for practitioners and researchers as the rise in civic engagement across higher education has grown. Institutions of higher education began to collaborate with communities as a way to connect intellectual, human, and financial resources to solve real-world community problems (Benson, Harkavy & Puckett, 1996). However, building mutually-beneficial partnerships between communities and institutions, often distinguished by reciprocity, shared goals, and effective communication (Bringle, Games, & Malloy, 1999; Harkavy, 1998; Harkavy & Benson, 1998; Jacoby, 2003; Pompa, 2002) is a complex endeavor. The partnerships between communities and universities often involve challenges such as paternalism, unequal power, elitism, clashes in values, and often-wrought histories (Strier, 2014). As a way to support building partnerships based in mutuality, and to address some of the challenges present in the complexity of community-university partnerships, community engagement centers on college and university campuses have created Community Advisory Boards (CABs). While Community Advisory Boards have become a structure within the practitioner-realm of community engagement work within higher education, there are gaps in the higher education literature and research that investigate CABs as models aimed to support and strengthen partnerships between communities and universities. This qualitative multi-site case study aims to fill the gaps through a comparative exploration of two Community Advisory Boards at Philadelphia area institutions of higher education. The CABs are housed within two different community engagement centers. The two CABs are located within Drexel University's Dornsife Center and the Community College of Philadelphia's Institute for Community Engagement and Civic Leadership. Through archival data, interviews, observations, surveys, memo writing, and member checks, I analyze and synthesize the similarities, differences, and patterns across these two cases by exploring the role, responsibilities and functions of the CABs and the successes and challenges to building strong mutually beneficial partnerships between the community and the institutions of higher education.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798837521928Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122863
Higher education administration.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Community advisory boardsIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

An Exploration of Two Community Advisory Boards within Community Engagement Centers at Institutions of Higher Education.
LDR:03788nmm a2200349K 4500 001 2355510
005 20230523082835.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798837521928
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29064553
035 $a AAI29064553
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Cannon, Elizabeth. $3 3695936
245 1 3 $a An Exploration of Two Community Advisory Boards within Community Engagement Centers at Institutions of Higher Education.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (188 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Hartley, Matthew.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Civic engagement has become an important part of the educational landscape at institutions of higher education in the United States. The development of mutually-beneficial community-university partnerships has become a common interest for practitioners and researchers as the rise in civic engagement across higher education has grown. Institutions of higher education began to collaborate with communities as a way to connect intellectual, human, and financial resources to solve real-world community problems (Benson, Harkavy & Puckett, 1996). However, building mutually-beneficial partnerships between communities and institutions, often distinguished by reciprocity, shared goals, and effective communication (Bringle, Games, & Malloy, 1999; Harkavy, 1998; Harkavy & Benson, 1998; Jacoby, 2003; Pompa, 2002) is a complex endeavor. The partnerships between communities and universities often involve challenges such as paternalism, unequal power, elitism, clashes in values, and often-wrought histories (Strier, 2014). As a way to support building partnerships based in mutuality, and to address some of the challenges present in the complexity of community-university partnerships, community engagement centers on college and university campuses have created Community Advisory Boards (CABs). While Community Advisory Boards have become a structure within the practitioner-realm of community engagement work within higher education, there are gaps in the higher education literature and research that investigate CABs as models aimed to support and strengthen partnerships between communities and universities. This qualitative multi-site case study aims to fill the gaps through a comparative exploration of two Community Advisory Boards at Philadelphia area institutions of higher education. The CABs are housed within two different community engagement centers. The two CABs are located within Drexel University's Dornsife Center and the Community College of Philadelphia's Institute for Community Engagement and Civic Leadership. Through archival data, interviews, observations, surveys, memo writing, and member checks, I analyze and synthesize the similarities, differences, and patterns across these two cases by exploring the role, responsibilities and functions of the CABs and the successes and challenges to building strong mutually beneficial partnerships between the community and the institutions of higher education.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 2122863
653 $a Community advisory boards
653 $a Community engagement centers
653 $a Institutions of higher education
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0446
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Pennsylvania. $b Higher Education. $3 2101612
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29064553 $z click for full text (PQDT)