東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Examining the Validity of Classifications from an English Language Proficiency Assessment for English Language Learners and Native English Speakers in Fifth Grade.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Examining the Validity of Classifications from an English Language Proficiency Assessment for English Language Learners and Native English Speakers in Fifth Grade./
作者:	Carroll, Patricia Elaine.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2012,
面頁冊數:	64 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 74-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International74-03.
標題:	Educational tests & measurements. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1516569
ISBN:	9781267549709

Examining the Validity of Classifications from an English Language Proficiency Assessment for English Language Learners and Native English Speakers in Fifth Grade.
Carroll, Patricia Elaine.

Examining the Validity of Classifications from an English Language Proficiency Assessment for English Language Learners and Native English Speakers in Fifth Grade. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2012 - 64 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 74-03.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2012.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

English language proficiency assessments are used to report English Language Learner (ELL) proficiency and progress, and classifications from these assessments help determine what educational services students receive. While classification validity is routinely reported by test vendors, empirical evidence is rarely used to justify the use of a certain classification model or scheme. In this study, fifth grade ELL and native English speaker (non-ELL) performance data on a State's Standards-Based Achievement Assessment (SBAA) and the State's English Language Proficiency Assessment (ELPA) are used to evaluate "proficient" and "non-proficient" classifications on the ELPA. Findings indicate that the currently-used conjunctive model, compared to compensatory and mixed models, creates classifications that are the least congruent with other sources of proficiency evidence for ELL and non-ELL students. Findings from this study can directly inform how policy, practice and research communities define and verify ELPA classifications for use in high-stakes decision making.

ISBN: 9781267549709Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168483
Educational tests & measurements.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Assessment

Examining the Validity of Classifications from an English Language Proficiency Assessment for English Language Learners and Native English Speakers in Fifth Grade.
LDR:02434nmm a2200409 4500 001 2344310
005 20220523132426.5
008 241004s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267549709
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1516569
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ucla:10589
035 $a AAI1516569
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Carroll, Patricia Elaine. $3 3193754
245 1 0 $a Examining the Validity of Classifications from an English Language Proficiency Assessment for English Language Learners and Native English Speakers in Fifth Grade.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2012
300 $a 64 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 74-03.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Bailey, Alison.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2012.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a English language proficiency assessments are used to report English Language Learner (ELL) proficiency and progress, and classifications from these assessments help determine what educational services students receive. While classification validity is routinely reported by test vendors, empirical evidence is rarely used to justify the use of a certain classification model or scheme. In this study, fifth grade ELL and native English speaker (non-ELL) performance data on a State's Standards-Based Achievement Assessment (SBAA) and the State's English Language Proficiency Assessment (ELPA) are used to evaluate "proficient" and "non-proficient" classifications on the ELPA. Findings indicate that the currently-used conjunctive model, compared to compensatory and mixed models, creates classifications that are the least congruent with other sources of proficiency evidence for ELL and non-ELL students. Findings from this study can directly inform how policy, practice and research communities define and verify ELPA classifications for use in high-stakes decision making.
590 $a School code: 0031.
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a English as a Second Language. $3 3423938
650 4 $a Education Policy. $3 2186666
653 $a Assessment
653 $a Classification
653 $a Conjunctive
653 $a English language learners
653 $a English language proficiency
653 $a Validity
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0458
710 2 $a University of California, Los Angeles. $b Education 0249. $3 2036364
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 74-03.
790 $a 0031
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1516569