東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Drawing/Writing: A brain research-ba...

Sheridan, Susan Rich.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Drawing/Writing: A brain research-based writing program designed to develop descriptive, analytical and inferential thinking skills at the elementary school level.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Drawing/Writing: A brain research-based writing program designed to develop descriptive, analytical and inferential thinking skills at the elementary school level./
作者:	Sheridan, Susan Rich.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 1990,
面頁冊數:	229 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 52-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International52-02A.
標題:	Curricula. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9022744

Drawing/Writing: A brain research-based writing program designed to develop descriptive, analytical and inferential thinking skills at the elementary school level.
Sheridan, Susan Rich.

Drawing/Writing: A brain research-based writing program designed to develop descriptive, analytical and inferential thinking skills at the elementary school level. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 1990 - 229 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 52-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Massachusetts Amherst, 1990.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The research and the study focus on the problem of dissociated learning. Why do students fail to connect with knowledge? The purposes of the study are: to summarize research pertaining to brain growth; to describe educational approaches and tactics consistent with this research; to test a brain research-based program designed to connect children to knowledge. The study rests on two research-based assumptions: strategies that connect dysfunctional or developmentally delayed students with thinking and learning will connect children in general with thinking and learning; educational activities integrating spatial information processing with linguistic processing will develop thinking skills more effectively than programs that do not. The apparent reason for the success of a spatial/linguistic program is that cross-modal activities mirror, or model, the integrated processes of the brain, impacting attention, emotion and logical operations. Increasing numbers of students fail to connect with writing. Many of these students can draw. Can drawing be used to connect these students to writing as thinking? The hypothesis is that a cross-modal activity combining drawing (a spatial activity) with writing (a linguistic activity) will develop descriptive, analytical and inferential thinking skills more effectively than a writing program that does not. The study targets children who receive special services, including those with language- and attention-related problems. To test the hypothesis, a quasi-experimental/control study was designed, involving 200 students in grades K, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in intact classrooms in two elementary schools. Approximately 2,000 pieces of data revealed a significant effect for the treatment, Drawing/Writing, on writing and thinking skills in the experimental group, including students who receive special services. The conclusions of the research are that brain research has relevance for education and that cross-modal activities provide antidotes to dissociated learning. The conclusion of the study is that, as a writing program, Drawing/Writing has broad usefulness and appeal.Subjects--Topical Terms:

3422445
Curricula.

Drawing/Writing: A brain research-based writing program designed to develop descriptive, analytical and inferential thinking skills at the elementary school level.
LDR:03390nmm a2200349 4500 001 2280529
005 20210830065825.5
008 220723s1990 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI9022744
035 $a AAI9022744
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sheridan, Susan Rich. $3 3559066
245 1 0 $a Drawing/Writing: A brain research-based writing program designed to develop descriptive, analytical and inferential thinking skills at the elementary school level.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1990
300 $a 229 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 52-02, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Konicek, Richard D.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Massachusetts Amherst, 1990.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a The research and the study focus on the problem of dissociated learning. Why do students fail to connect with knowledge? The purposes of the study are: to summarize research pertaining to brain growth; to describe educational approaches and tactics consistent with this research; to test a brain research-based program designed to connect children to knowledge. The study rests on two research-based assumptions: strategies that connect dysfunctional or developmentally delayed students with thinking and learning will connect children in general with thinking and learning; educational activities integrating spatial information processing with linguistic processing will develop thinking skills more effectively than programs that do not. The apparent reason for the success of a spatial/linguistic program is that cross-modal activities mirror, or model, the integrated processes of the brain, impacting attention, emotion and logical operations. Increasing numbers of students fail to connect with writing. Many of these students can draw. Can drawing be used to connect these students to writing as thinking? The hypothesis is that a cross-modal activity combining drawing (a spatial activity) with writing (a linguistic activity) will develop descriptive, analytical and inferential thinking skills more effectively than a writing program that does not. The study targets children who receive special services, including those with language- and attention-related problems. To test the hypothesis, a quasi-experimental/control study was designed, involving 200 students in grades K, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in intact classrooms in two elementary schools. Approximately 2,000 pieces of data revealed a significant effect for the treatment, Drawing/Writing, on writing and thinking skills in the experimental group, including students who receive special services. The conclusions of the research are that brain research has relevance for education and that cross-modal activities provide antidotes to dissociated learning. The conclusion of the study is that, as a writing program, Drawing/Writing has broad usefulness and appeal.
590 $a School code: 0118.
650 4 $a Curricula. $3 3422445
650 4 $a Teaching. $3 517098
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0524
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0529
710 2 $a University of Massachusetts Amherst. $3 1019433
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 52-02A.
790 $a 0118
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 1990
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9022744