東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Sensitivity Analysis of Longitudinal...

Liu, Yu.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Sensitivity Analysis of Longitudinal Measurement Non-Invariance: A Second-Order Latent Growth Model Approach with Ordered-Categorical Indicators.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Sensitivity Analysis of Longitudinal Measurement Non-Invariance: A Second-Order Latent Growth Model Approach with Ordered-Categorical Indicators./
作者:	Liu, Yu.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	185 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International78-02B.
標題:	Quantitative psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10133722
ISBN:	9781339922973

Sensitivity Analysis of Longitudinal Measurement Non-Invariance: A Second-Order Latent Growth Model Approach with Ordered-Categorical Indicators.
Liu, Yu.

Sensitivity Analysis of Longitudinal Measurement Non-Invariance: A Second-Order Latent Growth Model Approach with Ordered-Categorical Indicators. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 185 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2016.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Researchers who conduct longitudinal studies are inherently interested in studying individual and population changes over time (e.g., mathematics achievement, subjective well-being). To answer such research questions, models of change (e.g., growth models) make the assumption of longitudinal measurement invariance. In many applied situations, key constructs are measured by a collection of ordered-categorical indicators (e.g., Likert scale items). To evaluate longitudinal measurement invariance with ordered-categorical indicators, a set of hierarchical models can be sequentially tested and compared. If the statistical tests of measurement invariance fail to be supported for one of the models, it is useful to have a method with which to gauge the practical significance of the differences in measurement model parameters over time. Drawing on studies of latent growth models and second-order latent growth models with continuous indicators (e.g., Kim & Willson, 2014a; 2014b; Leite, 2007; Wirth, 2008), this study examined the performance of a potential sensitivity analysis to gauge the practical significance of violations of longitudinal measurement invariance for ordered-categorical indicators using second-order latent growth models. The change in the estimate of the second-order growth parameters following the addition of an incorrect level of measurement invariance constraints at the first-order level was used as an effect size for measurement non-invariance. This study investigated how sensitive the proposed sensitivity analysis was to different locations of non-invariance (i.e., non-invariance in the factor loadings, the thresholds, and the unique factor variances) given a sufficient sample size. This study also examined whether the sensitivity of the proposed sensitivity analysis depended on a number of other factors including the magnitude of non-invariance, the number of non-invariant indicators, the number of non-invariant occasions, and the number of response categories in the indicators.

ISBN: 9781339922973Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144748
Quantitative psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Effect size

Sensitivity Analysis of Longitudinal Measurement Non-Invariance: A Second-Order Latent Growth Model Approach with Ordered-Categorical Indicators.
LDR:03364nmm a2200373 4500 001 2274489
005 20201202130007.5
008 220629s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339922973
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10133722
035 $a (MiAaPQ)asu:16195
035 $a AAI10133722
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Liu, Yu. $3 1259717
245 1 0 $a Sensitivity Analysis of Longitudinal Measurement Non-Invariance: A Second-Order Latent Growth Model Approach with Ordered-Categorical Indicators.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 185 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: West, Stephen G.;Tein, Jenn-Yun.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2016.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Researchers who conduct longitudinal studies are inherently interested in studying individual and population changes over time (e.g., mathematics achievement, subjective well-being). To answer such research questions, models of change (e.g., growth models) make the assumption of longitudinal measurement invariance. In many applied situations, key constructs are measured by a collection of ordered-categorical indicators (e.g., Likert scale items). To evaluate longitudinal measurement invariance with ordered-categorical indicators, a set of hierarchical models can be sequentially tested and compared. If the statistical tests of measurement invariance fail to be supported for one of the models, it is useful to have a method with which to gauge the practical significance of the differences in measurement model parameters over time. Drawing on studies of latent growth models and second-order latent growth models with continuous indicators (e.g., Kim & Willson, 2014a; 2014b; Leite, 2007; Wirth, 2008), this study examined the performance of a potential sensitivity analysis to gauge the practical significance of violations of longitudinal measurement invariance for ordered-categorical indicators using second-order latent growth models. The change in the estimate of the second-order growth parameters following the addition of an incorrect level of measurement invariance constraints at the first-order level was used as an effect size for measurement non-invariance. This study investigated how sensitive the proposed sensitivity analysis was to different locations of non-invariance (i.e., non-invariance in the factor loadings, the thresholds, and the unique factor variances) given a sufficient sample size. This study also examined whether the sensitivity of the proposed sensitivity analysis depended on a number of other factors including the magnitude of non-invariance, the number of non-invariant indicators, the number of non-invariant occasions, and the number of response categories in the indicators.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 2144748
653 $a Effect size
653 $a Longitudinal measurement invariance
653 $a Ordered-categorical data
653 $a Second-order latent growth model
653 $a Sensitivity analysis
690 $a 0632
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Psychology. $3 1677434
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 78-02B.
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10133722