東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Constructivist Approaches in Museum ...

Yoo, Juyoung.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Constructivist Approaches in Museum Tour and Workshop School Programs.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Constructivist Approaches in Museum Tour and Workshop School Programs./
作者:	Yoo, Juyoung.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	247 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-12A.
標題:	Art education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13881203
ISBN:	9781392213933

Constructivist Approaches in Museum Tour and Workshop School Programs.
Yoo, Juyoung.

Constructivist Approaches in Museum Tour and Workshop School Programs. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 247 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Teachers College, Columbia University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This research investigated how constructivist approaches are conceptualized and implemented in "gallery tour and studio workshop" programs at three art museums, and the relationship that exists between the gallery and studio learning. To address these questions, I examined how administrators from each museum designed programs and supported educators, how educators facilitated teaching, and how students responded to the gallery and studio learning.I employed a basic qualitative multi-case study. This method suited my research-an investigation of three cases (three iterations of a program at each museum)-because I aimed to understand the uniqueness of each case while examining a range of similar and contrasting cases. Data collection methods included observations of program sessions, interviews with museum administrators and museum educators, casual conversations with participating students, photos of students' artworks, and museum documents.The cases offer examples of educators' teaching approaches, which reflect-or do not reflect-constructivist tenets, as well as factors that influence the connection-or lack of connection-across gallery and studio learning. Specifically, the findings indicate that a smaller students-educator ratio and knowing students' information in advance helped ensure a conducive learning environment. Another relevant factor was the educators' facilitation of dialogue. Students became more involved in interpreting artworks when educators were most responsive to their ideas, and less involved when educators asked leading or less open-ended questions. Program themes, reflections on the tour prior to the studio session, and motivating questions for studio activities helped ensure connections between gallery and studio. Additionally, exploratory studio activities and small group discussions in the studio helped students make unique choices within their art projects, whereas step-by-step demonstrations led to prescriptive artworks. Further, students' responses reflected the sequencing of the program: ways of discussing artworks travelled from the galleries to the studio, and student artworks referenced visual elements from artworks displayed in the galleries.While the findings of this research are not generalizable, they provide insight into methods and approaches that might be adopted by museum administrators, museum educators, and art educators who aim to provide school students meaningful and well-connected museum "gallery tour and studio workshop" educational programs.

ISBN: 9781392213933Subjects--Topical Terms:

547650
Art education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Art education

Constructivist Approaches in Museum Tour and Workshop School Programs.
LDR:03768nmm a2200385 4500 001 2270546
005 20200930060334.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392213933
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13881203
035 $a (MiAaPQ)tc.columbia:10936
035 $a AAI13881203
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Yoo, Juyoung. $3 3547918
245 1 0 $a Constructivist Approaches in Museum Tour and Workshop School Programs.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 247 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Hubard, Olga.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Teachers College, Columbia University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This research investigated how constructivist approaches are conceptualized and implemented in "gallery tour and studio workshop" programs at three art museums, and the relationship that exists between the gallery and studio learning. To address these questions, I examined how administrators from each museum designed programs and supported educators, how educators facilitated teaching, and how students responded to the gallery and studio learning.I employed a basic qualitative multi-case study. This method suited my research-an investigation of three cases (three iterations of a program at each museum)-because I aimed to understand the uniqueness of each case while examining a range of similar and contrasting cases. Data collection methods included observations of program sessions, interviews with museum administrators and museum educators, casual conversations with participating students, photos of students' artworks, and museum documents.The cases offer examples of educators' teaching approaches, which reflect-or do not reflect-constructivist tenets, as well as factors that influence the connection-or lack of connection-across gallery and studio learning. Specifically, the findings indicate that a smaller students-educator ratio and knowing students' information in advance helped ensure a conducive learning environment. Another relevant factor was the educators' facilitation of dialogue. Students became more involved in interpreting artworks when educators were most responsive to their ideas, and less involved when educators asked leading or less open-ended questions. Program themes, reflections on the tour prior to the studio session, and motivating questions for studio activities helped ensure connections between gallery and studio. Additionally, exploratory studio activities and small group discussions in the studio helped students make unique choices within their art projects, whereas step-by-step demonstrations led to prescriptive artworks. Further, students' responses reflected the sequencing of the program: ways of discussing artworks travelled from the galleries to the studio, and student artworks referenced visual elements from artworks displayed in the galleries.While the findings of this research are not generalizable, they provide insight into methods and approaches that might be adopted by museum administrators, museum educators, and art educators who aim to provide school students meaningful and well-connected museum "gallery tour and studio workshop" educational programs.
590 $a School code: 0055.
650 4 $a Art education. $3 547650
650 4 $a Museum studies. $3 2122775
653 $a Art education
653 $a Constructivism
653 $a Gallery tours
653 $a Museum education
653 $a Museum programs
690 $a 0273
690 $a 0730
710 2 $a Teachers College, Columbia University. $b Arts and Humanities. $3 2093559
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-12A.
790 $a 0055
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13881203