東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Spatial Reasoning in Elementary Scho...

Hallowell, David Allen.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Spatial Reasoning in Elementary School Children's Geometry Insight: A Neo-Piagetian Developmental Proposal.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Spatial Reasoning in Elementary School Children's Geometry Insight: A Neo-Piagetian Developmental Proposal./
作者:	Hallowell, David Allen.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	139 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-11B.
標題:	Mathematics education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27741337
ISBN:	9798643187332

Spatial Reasoning in Elementary School Children's Geometry Insight: A Neo-Piagetian Developmental Proposal.
Hallowell, David Allen.

Spatial Reasoning in Elementary School Children's Geometry Insight: A Neo-Piagetian Developmental Proposal. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 139 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-11, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Following Robbie Case's branch of neo-Piagetian theory, this dissertation proposed a central geometric structure for the domain of geometry. In consultation with a professor of mathematics skilled in early childhood mathematics education, a series of geometry investigations was designed, and manipulatives of special triangles were 3D printed for use in the study. Forty-eight children from 2 California charter schools participated in the study. Sixteen students from each of second-, fourth-, and sixth grade participated. Children completed the Figural Intersections Test to assess M-capacity (mental attention), the WISC-V block design subtest to assess spatial visualization, and the WISC-V visual span test to assess visuospatial working memory. Children completed an identical series of pretest and posttest spatial items to assess learning over the course of the sessions. Geometry investigations were video recorded, transcribed and analyzed for a subset of students. Two students from each grade were selected for analysis. The maximal variation method of purposeful sampling was used as the selection framework (Emmel, 2014). For each grade level, the student who showed the lowest initial performance and no improvement from pretest to posttest was contrasted with the student who showed the most improvement. Children in the no-improvement group used fewer words to describe their activities when prompted, showed more constrained experimentation during the investigations, and exhibited fewer examples of hierarchical learning instances than their peers who did improve from pretest to posttest. Theoretical and educational implications are discussed below, as well as limitations and recommendations for future studies.

ISBN: 9798643187332Subjects--Topical Terms:

641129
Mathematics education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Cognitive development

Spatial Reasoning in Elementary School Children's Geometry Insight: A Neo-Piagetian Developmental Proposal.
LDR:02992nmm a2200385 4500 001 2269339
005 20200908090447.5
008 220629s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798643187332
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27741337
035 $a AAI27741337
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hallowell, David Allen. $3 3546658
245 1 0 $a Spatial Reasoning in Elementary School Children's Geometry Insight: A Neo-Piagetian Developmental Proposal.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 139 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Okamoto, Yukari.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Following Robbie Case's branch of neo-Piagetian theory, this dissertation proposed a central geometric structure for the domain of geometry. In consultation with a professor of mathematics skilled in early childhood mathematics education, a series of geometry investigations was designed, and manipulatives of special triangles were 3D printed for use in the study. Forty-eight children from 2 California charter schools participated in the study. Sixteen students from each of second-, fourth-, and sixth grade participated. Children completed the Figural Intersections Test to assess M-capacity (mental attention), the WISC-V block design subtest to assess spatial visualization, and the WISC-V visual span test to assess visuospatial working memory. Children completed an identical series of pretest and posttest spatial items to assess learning over the course of the sessions. Geometry investigations were video recorded, transcribed and analyzed for a subset of students. Two students from each grade were selected for analysis. The maximal variation method of purposeful sampling was used as the selection framework (Emmel, 2014). For each grade level, the student who showed the lowest initial performance and no improvement from pretest to posttest was contrasted with the student who showed the most improvement. Children in the no-improvement group used fewer words to describe their activities when prompted, showed more constrained experimentation during the investigations, and exhibited fewer examples of hierarchical learning instances than their peers who did improve from pretest to posttest. Theoretical and educational implications are discussed below, as well as limitations and recommendations for future studies.
590 $a School code: 0035.
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 641129
650 4 $a Early childhood education. $3 518817
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
653 $a Cognitive development
653 $a Geometry
653 $a Mathematical cognition
653 $a Mathematics education
653 $a Neo-Piagetian theory
653 $a Spatial reasoning
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0518
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a University of California, Santa Barbara. $b Education. $3 1024457
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-11B.
790 $a 0035
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27741337