東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Laboratory Use of Inquiry-Based Lear...

Hennighan, Kaitlin A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Laboratory Use of Inquiry-Based Learning vs. Direct Instruction.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Laboratory Use of Inquiry-Based Learning vs. Direct Instruction./
作者:	Hennighan, Kaitlin A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	43 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-10.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-10.
標題:	Middle school education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27832428
ISBN:	9798607302511

Laboratory Use of Inquiry-Based Learning vs. Direct Instruction.
Hennighan, Kaitlin A.

Laboratory Use of Inquiry-Based Learning vs. Direct Instruction. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 43 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-10.

Thesis (M.A.C.I.)--Caldwell University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

For students to internalize science content, they must be given opportunities to interact with it and conduct research as scientists would in the field (Next Generation Science Standards, 2013). Based on laboratory report scores, where students were either incorrectly answering content questions or the answers lacked evidence to support what they observed, this teacher researcher realized additional methodologies needed to be introduced to make learning more student-centered. She decided to implement direct instruction (DI) along with inquiry-based learning to support student understanding and increase motivation. Additionally, this teacher researcher collected data in the form of Likert scale surveys, open-ended questionnaires, and rubrics assessing laboratory experiments to measure these criteria. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the ways in which lab experiences affected student understanding using DI and inquiry-based learning. After implementing the study and a data analysis, it was found that students perceived that they were able to respond to the lab questions in more detail with DI. Furthermore, most students felt more confident in their learning with DI as opposed to inquiry-based instruction. However, student lab scores were slightly higher when the inquiry-based methodology was implemented. While students preferred DI, they performed better on lab conclusion questions by providing more evidence and reasoning, when inquiry-based teaching was implemented.

ISBN: 9798607302511Subjects--Topical Terms:

969762
Middle school education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Direct instruction

Laboratory Use of Inquiry-Based Learning vs. Direct Instruction.
LDR:02669nmm a2200373 4500 001 2268249
005 20200810100620.5
008 220629s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798607302511
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27832428
035 $a AAI27832428
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hennighan, Kaitlin A. $3 3545519
245 1 0 $a Laboratory Use of Inquiry-Based Learning vs. Direct Instruction.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 43 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-10.
500 $a Advisor: Jasmine, Joanne.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.C.I.)--Caldwell University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a For students to internalize science content, they must be given opportunities to interact with it and conduct research as scientists would in the field (Next Generation Science Standards, 2013). Based on laboratory report scores, where students were either incorrectly answering content questions or the answers lacked evidence to support what they observed, this teacher researcher realized additional methodologies needed to be introduced to make learning more student-centered. She decided to implement direct instruction (DI) along with inquiry-based learning to support student understanding and increase motivation. Additionally, this teacher researcher collected data in the form of Likert scale surveys, open-ended questionnaires, and rubrics assessing laboratory experiments to measure these criteria. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the ways in which lab experiences affected student understanding using DI and inquiry-based learning. After implementing the study and a data analysis, it was found that students perceived that they were able to respond to the lab questions in more detail with DI. Furthermore, most students felt more confident in their learning with DI as opposed to inquiry-based instruction. However, student lab scores were slightly higher when the inquiry-based methodology was implemented. While students preferred DI, they performed better on lab conclusion questions by providing more evidence and reasoning, when inquiry-based teaching was implemented.
590 $a School code: 1817.
650 4 $a Middle school education. $3 969762
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
653 $a Direct instruction
653 $a Inquiry-based learning
653 $a Laboratory experiments
653 $a Middle school
653 $a Science and adolescents
653 $a Science education
690 $a 0450
690 $a 0714
710 2 $a Caldwell University. $b Division of Education. $3 3350003
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-10.
790 $a 1817
791 $a M.A.C.I.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27832428