東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An examination of the effects of mul...

Defelice, Robyn A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An examination of the effects of multiple learning environments on problem solving in graduate instructional design students.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An examination of the effects of multiple learning environments on problem solving in graduate instructional design students./
作者:	Defelice, Robyn A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	196 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International77-02A.
標題:	Instructional Design. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3716426
ISBN:	9781321952650

An examination of the effects of multiple learning environments on problem solving in graduate instructional design students.
Defelice, Robyn A.

An examination of the effects of multiple learning environments on problem solving in graduate instructional design students. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 196 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2015.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This research seeks to comprehend the why, what, and how of novice instructional designers' (students of instructional design) interactions with their respective learning environment as they problem-solve. Even for foundational research on educational practices and its ability to increase instructional designers' skill development, there is still a need to understand the effectiveness of these approaches, such as real-world experiences and metacognition. In addition, there are deficiencies in the literature both in providing understanding to why these pedagogical methods are effective and in validating the effectiveness of these methods in various learning environments. Furthermore, there is a need for research of mediating variables in conjunction with different educational settings and pedagogical practices. Using grounded theory, this study examined how interactions within a learning environment shaped the novice instructional designer's perception of his or her problem-solving abilities. A problem-solving inventory used in a pre-/post-test format along with a three-part semi-structured interview series gathered these novice designers' experiences. Leveraging both online and face-to-face educational settings, inquiry and self-assessment yielded detail-rich research artifacts. Analysis occurred through qualitative and quantitative grounded theory methods. Findings indicated that problem solving and interactions within learning environments were decisions made by the student through a basic input-output process. The learner first decided internal determinations about key aspects of the issue. Then his or her perceived problem-solving abilities helped in choosing which interactions to use for resolving the problem. Students prioritized the pattern of their interactions based on what they thought would bring about the quickest resolution to their issue. The most common priority was through an individual's personal research. The findings serve as an initial opportunity to evaluate how to utilize online and traditional educational settings to facilitate development of problem-solving abilities. In addition, the self-defined learning environment and personal research, an additional interaction type, lend to further investigation. As a recommendation, before moving into more empirical and/or other inductive methods, researchers should advance this grounded theory study further to derive full meaning form the interplay of the education setting, student mediating variables, and interaction types.

ISBN: 9781321952650Subjects--Topical Terms:

3432465
Instructional Design.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Face-to-face learning

An examination of the effects of multiple learning environments on problem solving in graduate instructional design students.
LDR:03908nmm a2200409 4500 001 2266490
005 20200612094500.5
008 220629s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321952650
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3716426
035 $a (MiAaPQ)iup:11185
035 $a AAI3716426
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Defelice, Robyn A. $3 3543689
245 1 3 $a An examination of the effects of multiple learning environments on problem solving in graduate instructional design students.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 196 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-02, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Wilson, B. Gail.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2015.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This research seeks to comprehend the why, what, and how of novice instructional designers' (students of instructional design) interactions with their respective learning environment as they problem-solve. Even for foundational research on educational practices and its ability to increase instructional designers' skill development, there is still a need to understand the effectiveness of these approaches, such as real-world experiences and metacognition. In addition, there are deficiencies in the literature both in providing understanding to why these pedagogical methods are effective and in validating the effectiveness of these methods in various learning environments. Furthermore, there is a need for research of mediating variables in conjunction with different educational settings and pedagogical practices. Using grounded theory, this study examined how interactions within a learning environment shaped the novice instructional designer's perception of his or her problem-solving abilities. A problem-solving inventory used in a pre-/post-test format along with a three-part semi-structured interview series gathered these novice designers' experiences. Leveraging both online and face-to-face educational settings, inquiry and self-assessment yielded detail-rich research artifacts. Analysis occurred through qualitative and quantitative grounded theory methods. Findings indicated that problem solving and interactions within learning environments were decisions made by the student through a basic input-output process. The learner first decided internal determinations about key aspects of the issue. Then his or her perceived problem-solving abilities helped in choosing which interactions to use for resolving the problem. Students prioritized the pattern of their interactions based on what they thought would bring about the quickest resolution to their issue. The most common priority was through an individual's personal research. The findings serve as an initial opportunity to evaluate how to utilize online and traditional educational settings to facilitate development of problem-solving abilities. In addition, the self-defined learning environment and personal research, an additional interaction type, lend to further investigation. As a recommendation, before moving into more empirical and/or other inductive methods, researchers should advance this grounded theory study further to derive full meaning form the interplay of the education setting, student mediating variables, and interaction types.
590 $a School code: 0318.
650 4 $a Instructional Design. $3 3432465
650 4 $a Adult education. $3 543202
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
653 $a Face-to-face learning
653 $a Instructional design students
653 $a Learning environments
653 $a Online learning
653 $a Problem-solving
653 $a Self-efficacy
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0516
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a Indiana University of Pennsylvania. $b Comm. Media. $3 1677642
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 77-02A.
790 $a 0318
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3716426