東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An investigation of instructional de...

Crawford-Ayscue, Latonia Meria.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An investigation of instructional designers' criteria that predominantly influences reusability of learning objects.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An investigation of instructional designers' criteria that predominantly influences reusability of learning objects./
作者:	Crawford-Ayscue, Latonia Meria.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	183 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International76-09A.
標題:	Instructional Design. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3684455
ISBN:	9781321595772

An investigation of instructional designers' criteria that predominantly influences reusability of learning objects.
Crawford-Ayscue, Latonia Meria.

An investigation of instructional designers' criteria that predominantly influences reusability of learning objects. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 183 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2015.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Selection of the right tool to guide learning is the vital requisite of the design process. The basic interpretive qualitative study investigated predominate rationales that influenced experienced instructional designers' (users) decision to choose reusable learning objects and the attributes that supported the decision. Qualitative data from the intuitive narratives were thematically analyzed from the angle of ADDIE methodology, in the scientific field of Instructional Design, and behavioral and cognitive learning theories. Instructional designers encounter hypothetical and ill-structured learning challenges in virtual, computer-generated and other diverse learning environments. The study supplemented prior research by investigating rationale, in practice, over interviews with experienced instructional designers who had reused learning objects. The investigations added the vicarious dimension from the user's perspective and provided an applicational foundation for reuse when decisions, to select a learning object, had to be made during the design phase. The findings of this study revealed: (a) users' definition of reusable learning objects were wide-ranging; (b) understanding and value of reusable learning objects were based on participants' experience and interactions with the tool; (c) deployment of reusable learning objects, in instruction, was triggered by the trustworthiness and success of meeting learning goals and objectives from preceding projects; (d) the guides that influenced the decision to reuse learning objects were implications, criteria and situations; (e) attributes were relevant to practice; (f) underlying principles were important; and (g) standards for reusable learning objects were unique to the instructional designer.

ISBN: 9781321595772Subjects--Topical Terms:

3432465
Instructional Design.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Implications

An investigation of instructional designers' criteria that predominantly influences reusability of learning objects.
LDR:02975nmm a2200349 4500 001 2266484
005 20200612094459.5
008 220629s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321595772
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3684455
035 $a (MiAaPQ)capella:16829
035 $a AAI3684455
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Crawford-Ayscue, Latonia Meria. $3 3543683
245 1 3 $a An investigation of instructional designers' criteria that predominantly influences reusability of learning objects.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 183 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: LEWIS, BARBARA.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2015.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Selection of the right tool to guide learning is the vital requisite of the design process. The basic interpretive qualitative study investigated predominate rationales that influenced experienced instructional designers' (users) decision to choose reusable learning objects and the attributes that supported the decision. Qualitative data from the intuitive narratives were thematically analyzed from the angle of ADDIE methodology, in the scientific field of Instructional Design, and behavioral and cognitive learning theories. Instructional designers encounter hypothetical and ill-structured learning challenges in virtual, computer-generated and other diverse learning environments. The study supplemented prior research by investigating rationale, in practice, over interviews with experienced instructional designers who had reused learning objects. The investigations added the vicarious dimension from the user's perspective and provided an applicational foundation for reuse when decisions, to select a learning object, had to be made during the design phase. The findings of this study revealed: (a) users' definition of reusable learning objects were wide-ranging; (b) understanding and value of reusable learning objects were based on participants' experience and interactions with the tool; (c) deployment of reusable learning objects, in instruction, was triggered by the trustworthiness and success of meeting learning goals and objectives from preceding projects; (d) the guides that influenced the decision to reuse learning objects were implications, criteria and situations; (e) attributes were relevant to practice; (f) underlying principles were important; and (g) standards for reusable learning objects were unique to the instructional designer.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Instructional Design. $3 3432465
653 $a Implications
653 $a Instructional design practice
653 $a Reusable learning objects
690 $a 0447
710 2 $a Capella University. $b School of Education. $3 1018430
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 76-09A.
790 $a 1351
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3684455