東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Phenomenological Study of Professo...

Chittur, Debra.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Phenomenological Study of Professors and Instructional Designers During Online Course Development Leading to Enhanced Student-Centered Pedagogy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Phenomenological Study of Professors and Instructional Designers During Online Course Development Leading to Enhanced Student-Centered Pedagogy./
作者:	Chittur, Debra.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	155 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International79-11A.
標題:	Instructional Design. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10790356
ISBN:	9780355854992

A Phenomenological Study of Professors and Instructional Designers During Online Course Development Leading to Enhanced Student-Centered Pedagogy.
Chittur, Debra.

A Phenomenological Study of Professors and Instructional Designers During Online Course Development Leading to Enhanced Student-Centered Pedagogy. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 155 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Pepperdine University, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This study explored the experiences of professors and instructional designers as they interact to design and develop a distance learning course. Six professors from several different universities who reported that their pedagogy improved after these interactions during the conversion process were identified and interviewed, along with the instructional designers with whom they collaborated, to determine what elements of the interaction led to the change in their pedagogical practices. The study used a Hermeneutics phenomenology approach employing a universal instructional design model (Merrill, 2013) and a threat regulation model of trust (Williams, 2007) to shape data collection and analysis. Analysis of the data showed that principles from the instructional design model (Merrill, 2013) were used by the instructional designers to communicate good teaching practices. Strategies from the trust-building model (Williams, 2007) were employed by the instructional designers as well as some of the faculty to reduce threats to collaboration. Faculty reported incorporating a more student-centered approach to their subsequent teaching, based primarily on improved student outcomes in these courses, including satisfaction, engagement, and retention of new knowledge. Four conclusions emerged from the findings: (a) Merrill's First Principles (2013) is a useful model for explaining student-centered practices in higher education, particularly the principle of using real-world problems in course design, (b) Williams's trust-building model explains some of the success of the professor/instructional designer interactions, (c) professors valued pedagogical support from experienced instructional designers, who facilitated changes in their thinking about pedagogy, and (d) professors were more likely to make changes in pedagogy when they could anticipate improved learning outcomes. Universities are recommended to implement the use of professional instructional designers and quality frameworks to introduce faculty to student-centered teaching practices. As change agents in the universities, instructional designers should take advantage of the opportunity to impact teaching practices in universities. Further research might explore how faculty incorporate new knowledge acquired as a result of interacting with instructional designers into their teaching. In addition, future studies could examine the incorporation of those features of instructional design that are not reflected in active learning methods, particularly the use of backward design to create connections between learning activities.

ISBN: 9780355854992Subjects--Topical Terms:

3432465
Instructional Design.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Hermeneutics

A Phenomenological Study of Professors and Instructional Designers During Online Course Development Leading to Enhanced Student-Centered Pedagogy.
LDR:03911nmm a2200385 4500 001 2266370
005 20200612094432.5
008 220629s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355854992
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10790356
035 $a (MiAaPQ)pepperdinegsep:11009
035 $a AAI10790356
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chittur, Debra. $3 3543563
245 1 0 $a A Phenomenological Study of Professors and Instructional Designers During Online Course Development Leading to Enhanced Student-Centered Pedagogy.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 155 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Davis, Kay.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Pepperdine University, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This study explored the experiences of professors and instructional designers as they interact to design and develop a distance learning course. Six professors from several different universities who reported that their pedagogy improved after these interactions during the conversion process were identified and interviewed, along with the instructional designers with whom they collaborated, to determine what elements of the interaction led to the change in their pedagogical practices. The study used a Hermeneutics phenomenology approach employing a universal instructional design model (Merrill, 2013) and a threat regulation model of trust (Williams, 2007) to shape data collection and analysis. Analysis of the data showed that principles from the instructional design model (Merrill, 2013) were used by the instructional designers to communicate good teaching practices. Strategies from the trust-building model (Williams, 2007) were employed by the instructional designers as well as some of the faculty to reduce threats to collaboration. Faculty reported incorporating a more student-centered approach to their subsequent teaching, based primarily on improved student outcomes in these courses, including satisfaction, engagement, and retention of new knowledge. Four conclusions emerged from the findings: (a) Merrill's First Principles (2013) is a useful model for explaining student-centered practices in higher education, particularly the principle of using real-world problems in course design, (b) Williams's trust-building model explains some of the success of the professor/instructional designer interactions, (c) professors valued pedagogical support from experienced instructional designers, who facilitated changes in their thinking about pedagogy, and (d) professors were more likely to make changes in pedagogy when they could anticipate improved learning outcomes. Universities are recommended to implement the use of professional instructional designers and quality frameworks to introduce faculty to student-centered teaching practices. As change agents in the universities, instructional designers should take advantage of the opportunity to impact teaching practices in universities. Further research might explore how faculty incorporate new knowledge acquired as a result of interacting with instructional designers into their teaching. In addition, future studies could examine the incorporation of those features of instructional design that are not reflected in active learning methods, particularly the use of backward design to create connections between learning activities.
590 $a School code: 6009.
650 4 $a Instructional Design. $3 3432465
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
653 $a Hermeneutics
653 $a Higher education
653 $a Pedagogical change
653 $a Phenomenology
653 $a Trust-building
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a Pepperdine University. $b Education. $3 1019295
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 79-11A.
790 $a 6009
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10790356