東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Same Standards, Different Classes: C...

Wei, Yiwen.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Same Standards, Different Classes: Comparative Case Study on the Issue of Social Class in Public School Art Education.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Same Standards, Different Classes: Comparative Case Study on the Issue of Social Class in Public School Art Education./
作者:	Wei, Yiwen.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	254 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-03A.
標題:	Art education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13880785
ISBN:	9781085790512

Same Standards, Different Classes: Comparative Case Study on the Issue of Social Class in Public School Art Education.
Wei, Yiwen.

Same Standards, Different Classes: Comparative Case Study on the Issue of Social Class in Public School Art Education. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 254 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this study was to explore the issue of social class in art education. As mentioned in my theoretical framework underlying this study, Bourdieu (1973/2000) used the term cultural capital as forms of knowledge, tastes, and practices to explain the relationship between knowledge and power in the field of education. I employed Bourdieu's concepts of cultural capital to further develop my argument on the relationship between social class and visual arts education.By using qualitative comparative case study methods, I examined the similarities and differences in the implementation of visual art education between two selected third-grade classes with distinct aggregations of student socioeconomic status, yet taught by the same itinerant art teacher in the same county¬. I scrutinized and compared the two cases with respect to their overall access to art education resources, including funding, materials, and allotment of time for instruction; the art-related knowledge, values, and skills taught and emphasized in each art classroom; the similarities and differences between the two cases in terms of how art instruction was implemented and the art teacher's reasons for differentiating or not differentiating art instruction.This study was conducted in a metropolitan area in Virginia. I used purposeful sampling to select my participant-one itinerant visual art teacher, who traveled between and worked at a Title 1 elementary school and another elementary school within a relatively affluent area with a much lower rate of students eligible for the National School Lunch Program (NSLP). The difference in the percentages of students enrolling in the NSLP between these two schools is up to 73%. The fieldwork took place from October 2017 until March 2018. Through fieldwork, I collected data through observation, interviews, and relevant document collection. I then organized and analyzed the collected data during April 2018 to November 2018 and began to write the findings in December 2018. My data analysis strategies included writing initial codes and memos, generating patterns and themes, and selecting cross-cases themes and topics. The cross-case comparison identified the following findings: (1) the economic and racial/ethnic differences between the two school communities; (2) the disparities in external educational resources; (3) the differences in students' learning foundations and inspirations; (4) the emphasis on formalist aesthetics and craftsmanship in art instruction aligning with Virginia's Visual Art Standards; (5) the different in students' learning outcomes in art; and (6) the different cultures of learning between the two classes.Holding postmodern perspectives as my philosophical framework for this study, I value the local contexts in which I conducted this study and encourage readers to construct their own judgment and interpretation. Expanding upon my findings, I provided the implications of my study for visual arts coordinators and administrators, art education practitioners, and art teacher training programs in higher education. To further investigate the issue of social class in art education, I also recommended a multitude of relevant issues with methodologies to be used in future research.

ISBN: 9781085790512Subjects--Topical Terms:

547650
Art education.

Same Standards, Different Classes: Comparative Case Study on the Issue of Social Class in Public School Art Education.
LDR:04308nmm a2200313 4500 001 2210142
005 20191118121550.5
008 201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781085790512
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13880785
035 $a AAI13880785
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wei, Yiwen. $3 3437278
245 1 0 $a Same Standards, Different Classes: Comparative Case Study on the Issue of Social Class in Public School Art Education.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 254 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Broome, Jeffrey.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to explore the issue of social class in art education. As mentioned in my theoretical framework underlying this study, Bourdieu (1973/2000) used the term cultural capital as forms of knowledge, tastes, and practices to explain the relationship between knowledge and power in the field of education. I employed Bourdieu's concepts of cultural capital to further develop my argument on the relationship between social class and visual arts education.By using qualitative comparative case study methods, I examined the similarities and differences in the implementation of visual art education between two selected third-grade classes with distinct aggregations of student socioeconomic status, yet taught by the same itinerant art teacher in the same county¬. I scrutinized and compared the two cases with respect to their overall access to art education resources, including funding, materials, and allotment of time for instruction; the art-related knowledge, values, and skills taught and emphasized in each art classroom; the similarities and differences between the two cases in terms of how art instruction was implemented and the art teacher's reasons for differentiating or not differentiating art instruction.This study was conducted in a metropolitan area in Virginia. I used purposeful sampling to select my participant-one itinerant visual art teacher, who traveled between and worked at a Title 1 elementary school and another elementary school within a relatively affluent area with a much lower rate of students eligible for the National School Lunch Program (NSLP). The difference in the percentages of students enrolling in the NSLP between these two schools is up to 73%. The fieldwork took place from October 2017 until March 2018. Through fieldwork, I collected data through observation, interviews, and relevant document collection. I then organized and analyzed the collected data during April 2018 to November 2018 and began to write the findings in December 2018. My data analysis strategies included writing initial codes and memos, generating patterns and themes, and selecting cross-cases themes and topics. The cross-case comparison identified the following findings: (1) the economic and racial/ethnic differences between the two school communities; (2) the disparities in external educational resources; (3) the differences in students' learning foundations and inspirations; (4) the emphasis on formalist aesthetics and craftsmanship in art instruction aligning with Virginia's Visual Art Standards; (5) the different in students' learning outcomes in art; and (6) the different cultures of learning between the two classes.Holding postmodern perspectives as my philosophical framework for this study, I value the local contexts in which I conducted this study and encourage readers to construct their own judgment and interpretation. Expanding upon my findings, I provided the implications of my study for visual arts coordinators and administrators, art education practitioners, and art teacher training programs in higher education. To further investigate the issue of social class in art education, I also recommended a multitude of relevant issues with methodologies to be used in future research.
590 $a School code: 0071.
650 4 $a Art education. $3 547650
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
650 4 $a Teacher education. $3 3172312
690 $a 0273
690 $a 0524
690 $a 0530
710 2 $a The Florida State University. $b Art Education. $3 2099272
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-03A.
790 $a 0071
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13880785