東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An Evaluation of a Response Allocati...

Quigley, Jennifer.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Evaluation of a Response Allocation Assessment as an Alternative to Current Functional Analysis Methodologies.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An Evaluation of a Response Allocation Assessment as an Alternative to Current Functional Analysis Methodologies./
作者:	Quigley, Jennifer.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	76 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-12B.
標題:	Disability studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13808444
ISBN:	9781392163269

An Evaluation of a Response Allocation Assessment as an Alternative to Current Functional Analysis Methodologies.
Quigley, Jennifer.

An Evaluation of a Response Allocation Assessment as an Alternative to Current Functional Analysis Methodologies. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 76 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The "standard" functional analysis (SFA) is an empirical demonstration of a cause-effect relationship between a target behavior and environmental variables; it includes a set of test conditions compared to a control condition (Iwata & Dozier, 2008). During the past 15 years, criticisms have arisen of the SFA including (a) the experience required to successfully design and implement the analysis, (b) resources required, (c) extended duration of analysis, (d) evoking potentially dangerous behavior, (e) required control over environmental conditions, and (f) potential findings of ambiguous results (Ellis & Magee, 2004; Hanley, 2012; Iwata & Dozier, 2008). Though multiple research studies and reviews have aimed to address these concerns through a variety of modifications, the current research study aimed to replicate and extend previous research by proposing a new alternative to functional analysis methodologies, the response allocation assessment (RAA). The RAA measures the participant's allocation of the targeted challenging behavior or functional replacement behavior in a concurrent schedule format with a latency measure. This methodology enables the clinician to identify the function of challenging behavior while also assessing the participant's ability to engage in the targeted replacement behavior. The current study evaluated the RAA's efficiency and effectiveness in assessing the functions of targeted challenging behavior in comparison to the SFA and discuss the possible social acceptance and validity of the RAA.

ISBN: 9781392163269Subjects--Topical Terms:

543687
Disability studies.

An Evaluation of a Response Allocation Assessment as an Alternative to Current Functional Analysis Methodologies.
LDR:02689nmm a2200325 4500 001 2209554
005 20191105130508.5
008 201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392163269
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13808444
035 $a (MiAaPQ)thechicagoschool:12327
035 $a AAI13808444
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Quigley, Jennifer. $3 3436643
245 1 3 $a An Evaluation of a Response Allocation Assessment as an Alternative to Current Functional Analysis Methodologies.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 76 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Brandt, Julie A. Ackerlund.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The "standard" functional analysis (SFA) is an empirical demonstration of a cause-effect relationship between a target behavior and environmental variables; it includes a set of test conditions compared to a control condition (Iwata & Dozier, 2008). During the past 15 years, criticisms have arisen of the SFA including (a) the experience required to successfully design and implement the analysis, (b) resources required, (c) extended duration of analysis, (d) evoking potentially dangerous behavior, (e) required control over environmental conditions, and (f) potential findings of ambiguous results (Ellis & Magee, 2004; Hanley, 2012; Iwata & Dozier, 2008). Though multiple research studies and reviews have aimed to address these concerns through a variety of modifications, the current research study aimed to replicate and extend previous research by proposing a new alternative to functional analysis methodologies, the response allocation assessment (RAA). The RAA measures the participant's allocation of the targeted challenging behavior or functional replacement behavior in a concurrent schedule format with a latency measure. This methodology enables the clinician to identify the function of challenging behavior while also assessing the participant's ability to engage in the targeted replacement behavior. The current study evaluated the RAA's efficiency and effectiveness in assessing the functions of targeted challenging behavior in comparison to the SFA and discuss the possible social acceptance and validity of the RAA.
590 $a School code: 0971.
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
690 $a 0201
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a The Chicago School of Professional Psychology. $b Applied Behavioral Analysis. $3 2102195
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-12B.
790 $a 0971
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13808444