東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Peer Harassment of Students with Dis...

Richardson, Emily.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Peer Harassment of Students with Disabilities: A Legal Standard Analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Peer Harassment of Students with Disabilities: A Legal Standard Analysis./
作者:	Richardson, Emily.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	200 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-10A.
標題:	Disability studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13811630
ISBN:	9781392074190

Peer Harassment of Students with Disabilities: A Legal Standard Analysis.
Richardson, Emily.

Peer Harassment of Students with Disabilities: A Legal Standard Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 200 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation examines the special issue of peer harassment of students with disabilities through a legal lens, exploring the legal standards used in cases involving three federal statutes-Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act ("Section 504"), the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"). Using legal research methods, litigation trends regarding the number of cases and the legal standard used and applied were explored. There has been no Supreme Court case on the legal standard to be used under Section 504, the ADA, or IDEA in peer harassment of students with disabilities, and circuit courts of appeals have not reached consensus on which legal standard should apply. Instead, courts have applied several different legal standards, including the Davis standard, a modified Davis standard, bad faith and gross misjudgment, deliberate indifference, disability discrimination, intentional discrimination, and denial of a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). This dissertation synthesizes the relevant legal standards used in each federal circuit and identifies trends that might guide the future of this type of litigation.

ISBN: 9781392074190Subjects--Topical Terms:

543687
Disability studies.

Peer Harassment of Students with Disabilities: A Legal Standard Analysis.
LDR:02301nmm a2200349 4500 001 2207107
005 20190913102451.5
008 201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392074190
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13811630
035 $a (MiAaPQ)indiana:15653
035 $a AAI13811630
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Richardson, Emily. $3 3434047
245 1 0 $a Peer Harassment of Students with Disabilities: A Legal Standard Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 200 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Eckes, Suzanne E.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation examines the special issue of peer harassment of students with disabilities through a legal lens, exploring the legal standards used in cases involving three federal statutes-Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act ("Section 504"), the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"). Using legal research methods, litigation trends regarding the number of cases and the legal standard used and applied were explored. There has been no Supreme Court case on the legal standard to be used under Section 504, the ADA, or IDEA in peer harassment of students with disabilities, and circuit courts of appeals have not reached consensus on which legal standard should apply. Instead, courts have applied several different legal standards, including the Davis standard, a modified Davis standard, bad faith and gross misjudgment, deliberate indifference, disability discrimination, intentional discrimination, and denial of a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). This dissertation synthesizes the relevant legal standards used in each federal circuit and identifies trends that might guide the future of this type of litigation.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
650 4 $a Educational sociology. $3 519608
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Education Policy. $3 2186666
690 $a 0201
690 $a 0340
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0458
710 2 $a Indiana University. $b Education. $3 3170453
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-10A.
790 $a 0093
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13811630