東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Situational judgment tests: An explo...

Miller, Bryon H.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Situational judgment tests: An exploration of reliability estimates and scoring models.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Situational judgment tests: An exploration of reliability estimates and scoring models./
Author:	Miller, Bryon H.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
Description:	157 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-11B(E).
Subject:	Quantitative psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3712696
ISBN:	9781321896961

Situational judgment tests: An exploration of reliability estimates and scoring models.
Miller, Bryon H.

Situational judgment tests: An exploration of reliability estimates and scoring models. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 157 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Alliant International University, 2015.

Situational judgment tests (SJT) have a long history in personnel selection but have found increased popularity over the past few decades. Although these assessments have been shown to be good predictors of job performance (Christian, Edwards, & Bradley, 2010) and produce lower subgroup differences than cognitive ability measures (Whetzel, McDaniel, & Nguyen, 2008), the theoretical and psychometric evidence supporting important test characteristics is relatively new. The purpose of this study was to examine how SJT scoring methods and models affect reliability, subgroup differences, score distributions, changes in examinee rank, and the relationship with cognitive ability. By employing several models and methods of scoring, this study demonstrated extreme differences in examinee ranks, despite having significant statistical relationships with one another. Additionally, alternative methods of estimating reliability including greatest lower bound (glb), McDonald's omega, and Guttman's lower bound were explored. A thorough synthesis of the current state of SJT literature is provided, as well as the contributions, implications, and limitations of the results of this study for the development of SJTs and personnel selection.

ISBN: 9781321896961Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144748
Quantitative psychology.

Situational judgment tests: An exploration of reliability estimates and scoring models.
LDR:02186nmm a2200289 4500 001 2205296
005 20190717110308.5
008 201008s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321896961
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3712696
035 $a (MiAaPQ)alliant:12090
035 $a AAI3712696
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Miller, Bryon H. $3 3432159
245 1 0 $a Situational judgment tests: An exploration of reliability estimates and scoring models.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 157 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Calvin C. Hoffman.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Alliant International University, 2015.
520 $a Situational judgment tests (SJT) have a long history in personnel selection but have found increased popularity over the past few decades. Although these assessments have been shown to be good predictors of job performance (Christian, Edwards, & Bradley, 2010) and produce lower subgroup differences than cognitive ability measures (Whetzel, McDaniel, & Nguyen, 2008), the theoretical and psychometric evidence supporting important test characteristics is relatively new. The purpose of this study was to examine how SJT scoring methods and models affect reliability, subgroup differences, score distributions, changes in examinee rank, and the relationship with cognitive ability. By employing several models and methods of scoring, this study demonstrated extreme differences in examinee ranks, despite having significant statistical relationships with one another. Additionally, alternative methods of estimating reliability including greatest lower bound (glb), McDonald's omega, and Guttman's lower bound were explored. A thorough synthesis of the current state of SJT literature is provided, as well as the contributions, implications, and limitations of the results of this study for the development of SJTs and personnel selection.
590 $a School code: 1634.
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 2144748
690 $a 0632
710 2 $a Alliant International University. $b Los Angeles-CSPP-OP. $3 2097749
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-11B(E).
790 $a 1634
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3712696