Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Search
Recommendations
ReaderScope
My Account
Help
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Public Library Lists
Public Reader Lists
AcademicReservedBook [CH]
BookLoanBillboard [CH]
BookReservedBillboard [CH]
Classification Browse [CH]
Exhibition [CH]
New books RSS feed [CH]
Personal Details
Saved Searches
Recommendations
Borrow/Reserve record
Reviews
Personal Lists
ETIBS
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
An Evaluation of Undergraduate Agric...
~
Andrew, Chandra L.
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
An Evaluation of Undergraduate Agricultural Communication Degree Programs.
Record Type:
Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
An Evaluation of Undergraduate Agricultural Communication Degree Programs./
Author:
Andrew, Chandra L.
Published:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
Description:
326 p.
Notes:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International78-10A(E).
Subject:
Agricultural education. -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10265247
ISBN:
9781369787863
An Evaluation of Undergraduate Agricultural Communication Degree Programs.
Andrew, Chandra L.
An Evaluation of Undergraduate Agricultural Communication Degree Programs.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 326 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ed.D.)--Tarleton State University, 2017.
Stufflebeam's (1969) context, input, process, product (CIPP) model was used to evaluate 11 undergraduate agricultural communication programs. The programs were selected based upon their 2012-2013 membership numbers in the National Agricultural Communicators of Tomorrow chapters, with the goal of selecting the universities with the largest undergraduate agricultural communication programs. Research has indicated that regular evaluation is vital to the agricultural industry and the graduates from agricultural communication programs.
ISBN: 9781369787863Subjects--Topical Terms:
612126
Agricultural education.
An Evaluation of Undergraduate Agricultural Communication Degree Programs.
LDR
:03049nmm a2200361 4500
001
2164880
005
20181127125341.5
008
190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781369787863
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10265247
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)tarleton:10209
035
$a
AAI10265247
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Andrew, Chandra L.
$3
3352935
245
1 3
$a
An Evaluation of Undergraduate Agricultural Communication Degree Programs.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2017
300
$a
326 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Don M. Beach.
502
$a
Thesis (Ed.D.)--Tarleton State University, 2017.
520
$a
Stufflebeam's (1969) context, input, process, product (CIPP) model was used to evaluate 11 undergraduate agricultural communication programs. The programs were selected based upon their 2012-2013 membership numbers in the National Agricultural Communicators of Tomorrow chapters, with the goal of selecting the universities with the largest undergraduate agricultural communication programs. Research has indicated that regular evaluation is vital to the agricultural industry and the graduates from agricultural communication programs.
520
$a
The researcher sought to answer the following research questions: 1. How many credit hours does each program require? 2. What categories of courses are offered within the curriculum for an undergraduate agricultural communication degree? 3. What are the expected topics students should receive in each category? 4. What is the degree productivity of each undergraduate degree or concentration in agricultural communication over a five-year timespan?
520
$a
The context portion of the study was the history of agricultural communication. The input construct of the model was the characteristics of undergraduate agricultural communication programs. The process portion of the model was the traditional programs' coursework offered in the programs. Finally, the product construct was the topics required by graduates.
520
$a
The evaluation identified 28 categories of coursework that occurred in the undergraduate agricultural communication curriculum of the 11 selected universities. The frequency of categories occurring at each university ranged from a high of 11 to a low of three. Topics varied depending upon category, but overlap of topics did occur among categories. The overlap indicates that faculty are striving to encompass multiple topics within their offered courses' framework.
520
$a
Finally, all programs had increased their number of graduates in a five-year timespan. With the exception of one program, all remaining programs expected enrollment to continue to increase in the future.
590
$a
School code: 1081.
650
4
$a
Agricultural education.
$3
612126
650
4
$a
Curriculum development.
$3
684418
650
4
$a
Educational evaluation.
$3
526425
690
$a
0517
690
$a
0727
690
$a
0443
710
2
$a
Tarleton State University.
$b
Educational Leadership & Policy Studies.
$3
3287575
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
78-10A(E).
790
$a
1081
791
$a
Ed.D.
792
$a
2017
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10265247
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9364427
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login