東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Norming at Scale: Faculty Perception...

Williams, Nicholas.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Norming at Scale: Faculty Perceptions of Assessment Culture and Student Learning Outcomes Assessment.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Norming at Scale: Faculty Perceptions of Assessment Culture and Student Learning Outcomes Assessment./
作者:	Williams, Nicholas.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	187 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
標題:	Higher education administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10809240
ISBN:	9780355930252

Norming at Scale: Faculty Perceptions of Assessment Culture and Student Learning Outcomes Assessment.
Williams, Nicholas.

Norming at Scale: Faculty Perceptions of Assessment Culture and Student Learning Outcomes Assessment. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 187 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.

To foster both external and internal accountability, universities seek more effective models for student learning outcomes assessment (SLOA). Meaningful and authentic measurement of program-level student learning outcomes requires engagement with an institution's faculty members, especially to gather student performance assessment data using common scoring instruments, or rubrics, across a university's many colleges and programs. Too often, however, institutions rely on faculty engagement for SLOA initiatives like this without providing necessary support, communication, and training. The resulting data may lack sufficient reliability and reflect deficiencies in an institution's culture of assessment.

ISBN: 9780355930252Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122863
Higher education administration.

Norming at Scale: Faculty Perceptions of Assessment Culture and Student Learning Outcomes Assessment.
LDR:03389nmm a2200337 4500 001 2164506
005 20181106103646.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355930252
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10809240
035 $a (MiAaPQ)asu:17839
035 $a AAI10809240
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Williams, Nicholas. $3 3352557
245 1 0 $a Norming at Scale: Faculty Perceptions of Assessment Culture and Student Learning Outcomes Assessment.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 187 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Daniel D. Liou.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.
520 $a To foster both external and internal accountability, universities seek more effective models for student learning outcomes assessment (SLOA). Meaningful and authentic measurement of program-level student learning outcomes requires engagement with an institution's faculty members, especially to gather student performance assessment data using common scoring instruments, or rubrics, across a university's many colleges and programs. Too often, however, institutions rely on faculty engagement for SLOA initiatives like this without providing necessary support, communication, and training. The resulting data may lack sufficient reliability and reflect deficiencies in an institution's culture of assessment.
520 $a This mixed methods action research study gauged how well one form of SLOA training -- a rubric-norming workshop -- could affect both inter-rater reliability for faculty scorers and faculty perceptions of SLOA while exploring the nature of faculty collaboration toward a shared understanding of student learning outcomes. The study participants, ten part-time faculty members at the institution, each held primary careers in the health care industry, apart from their secondary role teaching university courses. Accordingly, each contributed expertise and experience to the rubric-norming discussions, surveys of assessment-related perceptions, and individual scoring of student performance with a common rubric. Drawing on sociocultural learning principles and the specific lens of activity theory, influences on faculty SLOA were arranged and analyzed within the heuristic framework of an activity system to discern effects of collaboration and perceptions toward SLOA on consistent rubric-scoring by faculty participants.
520 $a Findings suggest participation in the study did not correlate to increased inter-rater reliability for faculty scorers when using the common rubric. Constraints found within assessment tools and unclear institutional leadership prevented more reliable use of common rubrics. Instead, faculty participants resorted to individual assessment approaches to meaningfully guide students to classroom achievement and preparation for careers in the health care field. Despite this, faculty participants valued SLOA, collaborated readily with colleagues for shared assessment goals, and worked hard to teach and assess students meaningfully.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 2122863
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0443
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Leadership and Innovation. $3 1680650
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09A(E).
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10809240