東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Developing a Resilience-Thinking Lea...

Duman, Lloyd.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Developing a Resilience-Thinking Leadership Mindset Scale.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Developing a Resilience-Thinking Leadership Mindset Scale./
作者:	Duman, Lloyd.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	228 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-07A(E).
標題:	Higher education administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10760365
ISBN:	9780355661941

Developing a Resilience-Thinking Leadership Mindset Scale.
Duman, Lloyd.

Developing a Resilience-Thinking Leadership Mindset Scale. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 228 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Antioch University, 2018.

The purpose of this study was to develop a resilience-thinking leadership mindset construct and scale. Although literature exists on developing resilience and relational leadership theories, very little research and literature address a resilience-thinking mindset as a leadership strategy. This study represents an initial step in filling this gap. This research project was the initial phase toward the development of a resilience-thinking leadership mindset (RTLM) scale. I used a mixed-methods approach which was divided into three stages. Stage 1 involved the development of the scale items and assessment of both face and content validity to revise the original scale. Stage 2 comprised conducting a pilot study and employing statistical analysis to assess the construct validity, which included an exploratory factor analysis and a partial confirmatory factor analysis (PCFA). The factor analysis revealed a two-factor solution with inter-item Cronbach's Alphas of .936 for Factor 1 and .906 for Factor 2. The PCFA revealed a CFI of .964. Stage 3 entailed giving the refined RTLM scale to leaders in field of resilience management to further interpret and refine the scale's factors and items. This scale will be useful to practitioners, researchers, and organizations that are interested in advancing resilience-thinking, mindful organizing, and adaptive governance. This dissertation is available in open access at AURA: Antioch University Repository and Archive, http://aura.antioch.edu/ and Ohiolink ETD Center, https://etd.ohiolink.edu/.

ISBN: 9780355661941Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122863
Higher education administration.

Developing a Resilience-Thinking Leadership Mindset Scale.
LDR:02496nmm a2200313 4500 001 2164484
005 20181106103645.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355661941
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10760365
035 $a (MiAaPQ)OhioLINK:antioch1512476003414579
035 $a AAI10760365
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Duman, Lloyd. $3 3352535
245 1 0 $a Developing a Resilience-Thinking Leadership Mindset Scale.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 228 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Antioch University, 2018.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to develop a resilience-thinking leadership mindset construct and scale. Although literature exists on developing resilience and relational leadership theories, very little research and literature address a resilience-thinking mindset as a leadership strategy. This study represents an initial step in filling this gap. This research project was the initial phase toward the development of a resilience-thinking leadership mindset (RTLM) scale. I used a mixed-methods approach which was divided into three stages. Stage 1 involved the development of the scale items and assessment of both face and content validity to revise the original scale. Stage 2 comprised conducting a pilot study and employing statistical analysis to assess the construct validity, which included an exploratory factor analysis and a partial confirmatory factor analysis (PCFA). The factor analysis revealed a two-factor solution with inter-item Cronbach's Alphas of .936 for Factor 1 and .906 for Factor 2. The PCFA revealed a CFI of .964. Stage 3 entailed giving the refined RTLM scale to leaders in field of resilience management to further interpret and refine the scale's factors and items. This scale will be useful to practitioners, researchers, and organizations that are interested in advancing resilience-thinking, mindful organizing, and adaptive governance. This dissertation is available in open access at AURA: Antioch University Repository and Archive, http://aura.antioch.edu/ and Ohiolink ETD Center, https://etd.ohiolink.edu/.
590 $a School code: 1216.
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 2122863
650 4 $a Business education. $3 543396
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 3168311
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0688
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0449
710 2 $a Antioch University. $b Leadership and Change. $3 1675206
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-07A(E).
790 $a 1216
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10760365