東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Examining the predictive validity of...

Curtin, Kristy A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Examining the predictive validity of the STAR Early Literacy and Reading Assessments across a sample of elementary school students.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Examining the predictive validity of the STAR Early Literacy and Reading Assessments across a sample of elementary school students./
作者:	Curtin, Kristy A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	169 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09B(E).
標題:	Quantitative psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10836562
ISBN:	9780355985375

Examining the predictive validity of the STAR Early Literacy and Reading Assessments across a sample of elementary school students.
Curtin, Kristy A.

Examining the predictive validity of the STAR Early Literacy and Reading Assessments across a sample of elementary school students. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 169 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Fairleigh Dickinson University, 2018.

The current research study sought to examine, within a universal screening paradigm, the predictive validity of two computer adaptive tests, the STAR Early Literacy (SEL) and Reading (SR) assessments. The focus was to establish whether these tools could accurately discriminate At-Risk from No-Risk groups using known performance on future measures of reading achievement. Results of several diagnostic efficiency analyses found that the STAR Early Literacy (SEL) assessment, when used as a universal screening tool in kindergarten and first grade, produced specificity values consistently above the widely accepted 80% threshold. However, similar to other prediction studies sensitivity values were mixed. Similar findings were reported when examining the predictive validity of the STAR Reading (SR) assessment. An added component to this study sought to compare performance over time between At-Risk and No-Risk groups established during the Fall of kindergarten. Results of several ANOVA's and unpaired t-tests revealed that the At-Risk group did not make enough gains over time to match the performance of their No-Risk peers. Although both the STAR Early Literacy (SEL) and STAR Reading (SR) assessments show promise as universal screening tools, more research is needed to substantiate their use within a universal screening paradigm.

ISBN: 9780355985375Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144748
Quantitative psychology.

Examining the predictive validity of the STAR Early Literacy and Reading Assessments across a sample of elementary school students.
LDR:02336nmm a2200301 4500 001 2163627
005 20181022132815.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355985375
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10836562
035 $a AAI10836562
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Curtin, Kristy A. $3 3351647
245 1 0 $a Examining the predictive validity of the STAR Early Literacy and Reading Assessments across a sample of elementary school students.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 169 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Judith Kaufman.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Fairleigh Dickinson University, 2018.
520 $a The current research study sought to examine, within a universal screening paradigm, the predictive validity of two computer adaptive tests, the STAR Early Literacy (SEL) and Reading (SR) assessments. The focus was to establish whether these tools could accurately discriminate At-Risk from No-Risk groups using known performance on future measures of reading achievement. Results of several diagnostic efficiency analyses found that the STAR Early Literacy (SEL) assessment, when used as a universal screening tool in kindergarten and first grade, produced specificity values consistently above the widely accepted 80% threshold. However, similar to other prediction studies sensitivity values were mixed. Similar findings were reported when examining the predictive validity of the STAR Reading (SR) assessment. An added component to this study sought to compare performance over time between At-Risk and No-Risk groups established during the Fall of kindergarten. Results of several ANOVA's and unpaired t-tests revealed that the At-Risk group did not make enough gains over time to match the performance of their No-Risk peers. Although both the STAR Early Literacy (SEL) and STAR Reading (SR) assessments show promise as universal screening tools, more research is needed to substantiate their use within a universal screening paradigm.
590 $a School code: 0287.
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 2144748
650 4 $a Early childhood education. $3 518817
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
690 $a 0632
690 $a 0518
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a Fairleigh Dickinson University. $3 1032368
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09B(E).
790 $a 0287
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10836562