東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Do the Right Thing! Exploring Ethica...

Fichter, Rachel Danielle.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Do the Right Thing! Exploring Ethical Decision-Making in Financial Institutions.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Do the Right Thing! Exploring Ethical Decision-Making in Financial Institutions./
作者:	Fichter, Rachel Danielle.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	244 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-10A(E).
標題:	Adult education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10276976
ISBN:	9781369794649

Do the Right Thing! Exploring Ethical Decision-Making in Financial Institutions.
Fichter, Rachel Danielle.

Do the Right Thing! Exploring Ethical Decision-Making in Financial Institutions. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 244 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Teachers College, Columbia University, 2017.

The purpose of this study on employee ethical decision-making (EDM) in financial institutions was to explore how bankers experience tension between a firm's formal ethical standards and those that are actually practiced, as they make decisions about issues that arise in their daily work. Interviews with 13 bankers explored three main questions: (a) how they approach challenging business decisions that have ethical implications; (b) what factors they take into consideration as part of the decision-making process, especially where existing laws and guidelines are inadequate; and (c) what learning processes they engage in that underpin their decision making.

ISBN: 9781369794649Subjects--Topical Terms:

543202
Adult education.

Do the Right Thing! Exploring Ethical Decision-Making in Financial Institutions.
LDR:03383nmm a2200349 4500 001 2156707
005 20180517121919.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369794649
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10276976
035 $a (MiAaPQ)tc.columbia:10663
035 $a AAI10276976
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fichter, Rachel Danielle. $3 3344470
245 1 0 $a Do the Right Thing! Exploring Ethical Decision-Making in Financial Institutions.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 244 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Lyle Yorks; Adela Gondek.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Teachers College, Columbia University, 2017.
520 $a The purpose of this study on employee ethical decision-making (EDM) in financial institutions was to explore how bankers experience tension between a firm's formal ethical standards and those that are actually practiced, as they make decisions about issues that arise in their daily work. Interviews with 13 bankers explored three main questions: (a) how they approach challenging business decisions that have ethical implications; (b) what factors they take into consideration as part of the decision-making process, especially where existing laws and guidelines are inadequate; and (c) what learning processes they engage in that underpin their decision making.
520 $a This qualitative inquiry utilized a single-case study method with a common rationale to provide insights into the ethical decision making across the financial industry. Three data collection methods were used: (a) a pre-interview questionnaire, (b) in-depth interviews using a critical incident technique, and (c) a review of publicly available industry documents. Four key findings emerged: 1. Bankers experienced significant tension between the espoused theories and theories-in-use of their organizations. 2. The majority of bankers endeavored to preserve their integrity and find meaning in their careers while accepting the tensions they experienced and even defending the industry. 3. Six factors impacted informal and incidental learning processes utilized by bankers for ethical decision making 4. All bankers engaged in at least one of three levels of reflection as part of their decision-making process.
520 $a Deeper insights into the data were revealed through a cross-interview analysis, and three analytical categories were used to further synthesize and interpret the data: (a) lack of fit between individual and organization priorities; (b) time horizon as a determinant of ethical decision making; and (c) individual, organizational, and environmental forces impacting learning.
520 $a Five conclusions were drawn from the descriptive findings and the analysis: 1. EDM in financial institutions is a complex social process. 2. Organizational strategies designed to help EDM actually prevent it. 3. Speaking up is hindered by the desire to preserve integrity. 4. Informal learning is important for EDM, but insufficient. 5. HR must have a voice as employee advocate.
590 $a School code: 0055.
650 4 $a Adult education. $3 543202
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
650 4 $a Finance. $3 542899
690 $a 0516
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0508
710 2 $a Teachers College, Columbia University. $b Organization and Leadership. $3 2049780
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-10A(E).
790 $a 0055
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10276976