東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A comparative study of moral educati...

Bao, Limin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A comparative study of moral education paradigms: Chinese Marxism and Kohlbergian Liberalism.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A comparative study of moral education paradigms: Chinese Marxism and Kohlbergian Liberalism./
作者:	Bao, Limin.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 1994,
面頁冊數:	314 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-02, Section: A, page: 4870.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International56-02A.
標題:	Educational philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9518533

A comparative study of moral education paradigms: Chinese Marxism and Kohlbergian Liberalism.
Bao, Limin.

A comparative study of moral education paradigms: Chinese Marxism and Kohlbergian Liberalism. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 1994 - 314 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-02, Section: A, page: 4870.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 1994.

This essay attempts to understand, evaluate, and improve two major kinds of moral education paradigms in the modern East and West, through a comparative study perspective. The vision of this essay differs from either simple, harsh condemnation or uncritical acceptance. First, it tries to make sense of what Chinese Marxism and Kohlbergian Liberalism have been doing, re-constructing the former as a two "type" norm system with a special virtue fostering method, and the latter as a value education project built around a version of liberalism. In discussing questions of theoretical ethics, I have worked out a four horizon scheme of moral content which is a synthesis of judicial, ethical, moral, and religious levels; and a two order value (moral/non-moral value) theory. Then I use these theoretical tools to analyze the idiosyncratic features of Chinese Marxism and Kohlbergian Liberalism. The essay further moves to the broader framework, and explores the different human ontologies, social cosmologies, and cultural backgrounds underlying the two projects. Finally, I evaluate the merits and defects of the two moral education paradigms according to a set of criteria argued in a systematic fashion, including the essential tension, equilibrium, heterogenous co-existence, time-sensitivity with logical adequacy, and cost calculation. Our analytical, comparative research enables us to point out the need and the way of mutual understanding and tolerance between the two value paradigms, and the necessary corrections particular to each moral education paradigm, the basic spirit of which, however, turns out to be the same: to restore the lacking several kinds of essential tensions.Subjects--Topical Terms:

3173367
Educational philosophy.

A comparative study of moral education paradigms: Chinese Marxism and Kohlbergian Liberalism.
LDR:02566nmm a2200277 4500 001 2121425
005 20170808141911.5
008 180830s1994 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI9518533
035 $a AAI9518533
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bao, Limin. $3 3283387
245 1 2 $a A comparative study of moral education paradigms: Chinese Marxism and Kohlbergian Liberalism.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1994
300 $a 314 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-02, Section: A, page: 4870.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 1994.
520 $a This essay attempts to understand, evaluate, and improve two major kinds of moral education paradigms in the modern East and West, through a comparative study perspective. The vision of this essay differs from either simple, harsh condemnation or uncritical acceptance. First, it tries to make sense of what Chinese Marxism and Kohlbergian Liberalism have been doing, re-constructing the former as a two "type" norm system with a special virtue fostering method, and the latter as a value education project built around a version of liberalism. In discussing questions of theoretical ethics, I have worked out a four horizon scheme of moral content which is a synthesis of judicial, ethical, moral, and religious levels; and a two order value (moral/non-moral value) theory. Then I use these theoretical tools to analyze the idiosyncratic features of Chinese Marxism and Kohlbergian Liberalism. The essay further moves to the broader framework, and explores the different human ontologies, social cosmologies, and cultural backgrounds underlying the two projects. Finally, I evaluate the merits and defects of the two moral education paradigms according to a set of criteria argued in a systematic fashion, including the essential tension, equilibrium, heterogenous co-existence, time-sensitivity with logical adequacy, and cost calculation. Our analytical, comparative research enables us to point out the need and the way of mutual understanding and tolerance between the two value paradigms, and the necessary corrections particular to each moral education paradigm, the basic spirit of which, however, turns out to be the same: to restore the lacking several kinds of essential tensions.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Educational philosophy. $3 3173367
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Asian history. $2 bicssc $3 1099323
690 $a 0998
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0332
710 2 $a Indiana University. $3 960096
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 56-02A.
790 $a 0093
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1994
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9518533