東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Universal screening for behavior: C...

Mason, Benjamin Allen.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Universal screening for behavior: Considerations in the use of behavior rating scales.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Universal screening for behavior: Considerations in the use of behavior rating scales./
作者:	Mason, Benjamin Allen.
面頁冊數:	102 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-07B(E).
標題:	Quantitative psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3537080
ISBN:	9781267961877

Universal screening for behavior: Considerations in the use of behavior rating scales.
Mason, Benjamin Allen.

Universal screening for behavior: Considerations in the use of behavior rating scales. - 102 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas A&M University, 2012.

Universal screening for behavior is the use of a measure of social, emotional or behavioral function across an entire population with a goal of preventing future difficulties by intervening with students identified by the screening protocol. Multiple screening procedures have been used, with most including behavior rating scales in the selection process. The purpose of the present research was to investigate two central questions related to the use of universal screeners for behavior in school settings: first, can scores on universal screeners be used as an outcome measure investigating program based interventions, and second, what evidence of teacher bias exists when an external criterion of behavior is included. The purpose of study one was to determine if differences in teacher-rated behavior could be detected between a sample of students that attended public preschool and a nonattending peer group matched for ethnicity, gender, and a gross measure of socioeconomic status (total n=138). Results of Study One indicated no significant differences between preschool-attending and nonattending groups (p=.61) or between Hispanic and Caucasian participants. Limitations related to sampling and measurement were discussed. In study two, a best-evidence synthesis of peer-reviewed articles investigating teacher bias in behavior ratings of students was conducted. Strict inclusion criteria were chosen to allow for inferential judgment of teacher accuracy. Results of Study Two found a final total of 25 studies of teacher bias that suggested mixed evidence for bias due to student ethnicity or gender and stronger evidence for bias due to expectancies (disability label), teacher culture, unrelated behaviors (halo effects), and teacher training and experience. Limitations, implications for practice and directions of future research were discussed.

ISBN: 9781267961877Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144748
Quantitative psychology.

Universal screening for behavior: Considerations in the use of behavior rating scales.
LDR:02765nmm a2200289 4500 001 2076248
005 20161028121050.5
008 170521s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267961877
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3537080
035 $a AAI3537080
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Mason, Benjamin Allen. $3 3191689
245 1 0 $a Universal screening for behavior: Considerations in the use of behavior rating scales.
300 $a 102 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Kimberly Vannest.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas A&M University, 2012.
520 $a Universal screening for behavior is the use of a measure of social, emotional or behavioral function across an entire population with a goal of preventing future difficulties by intervening with students identified by the screening protocol. Multiple screening procedures have been used, with most including behavior rating scales in the selection process. The purpose of the present research was to investigate two central questions related to the use of universal screeners for behavior in school settings: first, can scores on universal screeners be used as an outcome measure investigating program based interventions, and second, what evidence of teacher bias exists when an external criterion of behavior is included. The purpose of study one was to determine if differences in teacher-rated behavior could be detected between a sample of students that attended public preschool and a nonattending peer group matched for ethnicity, gender, and a gross measure of socioeconomic status (total n=138). Results of Study One indicated no significant differences between preschool-attending and nonattending groups (p=.61) or between Hispanic and Caucasian participants. Limitations related to sampling and measurement were discussed. In study two, a best-evidence synthesis of peer-reviewed articles investigating teacher bias in behavior ratings of students was conducted. Strict inclusion criteria were chosen to allow for inferential judgment of teacher accuracy. Results of Study Two found a final total of 25 studies of teacher bias that suggested mixed evidence for bias due to student ethnicity or gender and stronger evidence for bias due to expectancies (disability label), teacher culture, unrelated behaviors (halo effects), and teacher training and experience. Limitations, implications for practice and directions of future research were discussed.
590 $a School code: 0803.
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 2144748
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
690 $a 0632
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a Texas A&M University. $3 718977
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-07B(E).
790 $a 0803
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3537080