東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Estimation Approaches for Generalize...

Bainter, Sierra A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Estimation Approaches for Generalized Linear Factor Analysis Models with Sparse Indicators.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Estimation Approaches for Generalized Linear Factor Analysis Models with Sparse Indicators./
作者:	Bainter, Sierra A.
面頁冊數:	92 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-11B(E).
標題:	Quantitative psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10120031
ISBN:	9781339812229

Estimation Approaches for Generalized Linear Factor Analysis Models with Sparse Indicators.
Bainter, Sierra A.

Estimation Approaches for Generalized Linear Factor Analysis Models with Sparse Indicators. - 92 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2016.

Substance use research involves a number of methodological challenges that require advanced data analysis techniques. Generalized linear factor analysis (GLFA) is a general latent variable modeling framework useful for substance use research that can be applied to continuous or categorical measures. Unfortunately, substance use data is characterized by a large proportion of zeros (sparseness), and sparse endorsement can cause maximum likelihood estimation of GLFA models to fail. However the extent of estimation problems caused by sparseness has not previously been well studied. Because of the great need to improve reliability for estimating models with items with low endorsement, in this study I evaluated Bayesian estimation as an alternative to maximum likelihood estimation for GLFA models with sparse, categorical indicators. I found that the use of priors in Bayesian estimation eliminated extreme parameter estimates, improved estimate efficiency, increased empirical power to detect true effects, and provided meaningful results when models do not converge using ML estimation. I also found that the gains in efficiency and empirical power using Bayesian estimation depend on specifying adequately concentrated priors (i.e. adequate information to constrain inferences), and the increased overall efficiency and empirical power were also tied to a trade-off with overall unbiasedness. In sum, my proposal to use Bayesian estimation with prior information to estimate GLFA models with sparse indicators provides a much needed alternative for substance use researchers who wish to make inferences with sparse data.

ISBN: 9781339812229Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144748
Quantitative psychology.

Estimation Approaches for Generalized Linear Factor Analysis Models with Sparse Indicators.
LDR:02520nmm a2200265 4500 001 2076186
005 20161028121036.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339812229
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10120031
035 $a AAI10120031
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bainter, Sierra A. $3 2096030
245 1 0 $a Estimation Approaches for Generalized Linear Factor Analysis Models with Sparse Indicators.
300 $a 92 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Patrick Curran.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2016.
520 $a Substance use research involves a number of methodological challenges that require advanced data analysis techniques. Generalized linear factor analysis (GLFA) is a general latent variable modeling framework useful for substance use research that can be applied to continuous or categorical measures. Unfortunately, substance use data is characterized by a large proportion of zeros (sparseness), and sparse endorsement can cause maximum likelihood estimation of GLFA models to fail. However the extent of estimation problems caused by sparseness has not previously been well studied. Because of the great need to improve reliability for estimating models with items with low endorsement, in this study I evaluated Bayesian estimation as an alternative to maximum likelihood estimation for GLFA models with sparse, categorical indicators. I found that the use of priors in Bayesian estimation eliminated extreme parameter estimates, improved estimate efficiency, increased empirical power to detect true effects, and provided meaningful results when models do not converge using ML estimation. I also found that the gains in efficiency and empirical power using Bayesian estimation depend on specifying adequately concentrated priors (i.e. adequate information to constrain inferences), and the increased overall efficiency and empirical power were also tied to a trade-off with overall unbiasedness. In sum, my proposal to use Bayesian estimation with prior information to estimate GLFA models with sparse indicators provides a much needed alternative for substance use researchers who wish to make inferences with sparse data.
590 $a School code: 0153.
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 2144748
690 $a 0632
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $b Psychology. $3 1017867
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-11B(E).
790 $a 0153
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10120031