東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The National Labor Relations Act: St...

Rainey, Paul L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The National Labor Relations Act: Structuration and the interaction of policy and the hermeneutics of case law.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The National Labor Relations Act: Structuration and the interaction of policy and the hermeneutics of case law./
作者:	Rainey, Paul L.
面頁冊數:	348 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-09A(E).
標題:	Labor relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3689605
ISBN:	9781321691108

The National Labor Relations Act: Structuration and the interaction of policy and the hermeneutics of case law.
Rainey, Paul L.

The National Labor Relations Act: Structuration and the interaction of policy and the hermeneutics of case law. - 348 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2015.

The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) is a statute that contains a data-rich history rested upon a very controversial policy issue - that is, has the NLRA's primary policy directive fundamentally changed? The crux of this controversy is predicated upon a divergent policy interpretation that has manifested ever since the original law was amended in 1947 (Morris, 2012). While scholars, such as Gross (1985), have affirmed that policy directives have altered throughout the law's history, little attention has been given to the specific language used to infer judicial actors' interpretation of the law and previous scholarship has failed to provide a historical narrative of different policy strains throughout the NLRA's existence. That is, little attention has been given to the creation and recreation of policy with relation to the law.

ISBN: 9781321691108Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172144
Labor relations.

The National Labor Relations Act: Structuration and the interaction of policy and the hermeneutics of case law.
LDR:03087nmm a2200313 4500 001 2072774
005 20160822133518.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321691108
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3689605
035 $a AAI3689605
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rainey, Paul L. $3 3187989
245 1 4 $a The National Labor Relations Act: Structuration and the interaction of policy and the hermeneutics of case law.
300 $a 348 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Robert Heasley.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2015.
520 $a The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) is a statute that contains a data-rich history rested upon a very controversial policy issue - that is, has the NLRA's primary policy directive fundamentally changed? The crux of this controversy is predicated upon a divergent policy interpretation that has manifested ever since the original law was amended in 1947 (Morris, 2012). While scholars, such as Gross (1985), have affirmed that policy directives have altered throughout the law's history, little attention has been given to the specific language used to infer judicial actors' interpretation of the law and previous scholarship has failed to provide a historical narrative of different policy strains throughout the NLRA's existence. That is, little attention has been given to the creation and recreation of policy with relation to the law.
520 $a Informed by Gidden's structuration theory (1979), this dissertation explored the policy narrative of the NLRA as communicated through its body of related judicial and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) case law. A qualitative content analysis was conducted that seeks to highlight the specific statements of policy directives found in judicial actors' interpretation of the law. Data were sampled across the entire history of the statute and strains of policy were constructed to demonstrate the recreation of legal doctrines across time.
520 $a The data revealed that labor policy functions at three levels, which include base policy, mid-policy, and supra policy. Base policy is a relatively chaotic domain of policy that effectuates legal doctrines related to the day-to-day issues that arise with respect to the NLRA. Mid-policy encompasses ideologically informed dyad policies of the NLRA as being either a statute to promote collective bargaining or protect employee free choice to refrain from joining labor organizations. Supra policy constitutes the central policy of the NLRA as preventing industrial strife. These three layers of policy interact to create a socially constructed reality of U.S. labor law that is perpetuated by the NLRB, jurists, and Supreme Court.
590 $a School code: 0318.
650 4 $a Labor relations. $3 3172144
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0629
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a Indiana University of Pennsylvania. $b Sociology. $3 1044500
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-09A(E).
790 $a 0318
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3689605