東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Executives' decision making processe...

Jones, Renee K.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Executives' decision making processes regarding performance improvement challenges.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Executives' decision making processes regarding performance improvement challenges./
作者:	Jones, Renee K.
面頁冊數:	125 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-12A(E).
標題:	Educational philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3717997
ISBN:	9781321976564

Executives' decision making processes regarding performance improvement challenges.
Jones, Renee K.

Executives' decision making processes regarding performance improvement challenges. - 125 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2015.

A knowledge gap exists in the field of human performance technology (HPT) regarding how executives make decisions about performance improvement interventions and how executives weigh the importance of HPT when considering the complete array of possible business strategies to address a significant problem. This decision-making scenario study investigates and communicates the approaches and responses from 18 members of an organizational executive team, not including the chief executive officer, about performance improvement interventions and the consideration of HPT. The HPT model was used as a framework with a focus on the intervention selection phase from Van Tiem, Moseley, and Dessinger's Performance Improvement Interventions. Think aloud protocol, as demonstrated by Koro-Ljungberg, Douglas, Therriault, Malcolm, and McNeill; McCabe, Geraci, Boman, Sensenig, and Rhodes; Woiceshyn; and Zhou and Lin in their studies, was used as the method to gather data from each executive. Holton and Naquin's normative theory, behavioral theory, and naturalistic theory as detailed in Human Resource Development Quarterly were considered during the data analysis phase of the study. Data attained from this study extends previous research by focusing on other executives rather than chief executive officers and by focusing on companies other than oil companies and then communicates information to the field of performance improvement from an organizational versus an educational perspective. Recommendations for future research in the areas of gender and performance improvement, childhood issues and performance improvement, size of organization and performance improvement, executives thinking beyond normal organizational boundaries and performance improvement resulted.

ISBN: 9781321976564Subjects--Topical Terms:

3173367
Educational philosophy.

Executives' decision making processes regarding performance improvement challenges.
LDR:02670nmm a2200289 4500 001 2071002
005 20160628072951.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321976564
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3717997
035 $a AAI3717997
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jones, Renee K. $3 3186098
245 1 0 $a Executives' decision making processes regarding performance improvement challenges.
300 $a 125 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Paul Hardt.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2015.
520 $a A knowledge gap exists in the field of human performance technology (HPT) regarding how executives make decisions about performance improvement interventions and how executives weigh the importance of HPT when considering the complete array of possible business strategies to address a significant problem. This decision-making scenario study investigates and communicates the approaches and responses from 18 members of an organizational executive team, not including the chief executive officer, about performance improvement interventions and the consideration of HPT. The HPT model was used as a framework with a focus on the intervention selection phase from Van Tiem, Moseley, and Dessinger's Performance Improvement Interventions. Think aloud protocol, as demonstrated by Koro-Ljungberg, Douglas, Therriault, Malcolm, and McNeill; McCabe, Geraci, Boman, Sensenig, and Rhodes; Woiceshyn; and Zhou and Lin in their studies, was used as the method to gather data from each executive. Holton and Naquin's normative theory, behavioral theory, and naturalistic theory as detailed in Human Resource Development Quarterly were considered during the data analysis phase of the study. Data attained from this study extends previous research by focusing on other executives rather than chief executive officers and by focusing on companies other than oil companies and then communicates information to the field of performance improvement from an organizational versus an educational perspective. Recommendations for future research in the areas of gender and performance improvement, childhood issues and performance improvement, size of organization and performance improvement, executives thinking beyond normal organizational boundaries and performance improvement resulted.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Educational philosophy. $3 3173367
650 4 $a Business education. $3 543396
650 4 $a Banking. $2 bicssc $3 1557594
690 $a 0998
690 $a 0688
690 $a 0770
710 2 $a Capella University. $b School of Education. $3 1018430
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-12A(E).
790 $a 1351
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3717997