東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An archaeological/genealogical histo...

Bullock, Erika Catherine.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An archaeological/genealogical historical analysis of The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics' Standards documents.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An archaeological/genealogical historical analysis of The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics' Standards documents./
作者:	Bullock, Erika Catherine.
面頁冊數:	270 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-11A(E).
標題:	Mathematics education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3571369
ISBN:	9781303226342

An archaeological/genealogical historical analysis of The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics' Standards documents.
Bullock, Erika Catherine.

An archaeological/genealogical historical analysis of The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics' Standards documents. - 270 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgia State University, 2013.

Since the mid-20th century in the United States, there have been several reform movements within mathematics education; each movement has been subject to its own unique socio-cultural and -political forces. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics' (NCTM) Standards documents---Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989), Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991), Assessment Standards for School Mathematics (1995), and Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000)---not only represent the most recent of these reform movements but also the most enduring. Collectively, these documents have formed a discourse (cf. Foucault, 1969/1972)---Standards-based mathematics education---that has guided mathematics education through the 1990s and beyond. This study uses Foucaultian archaeological and genealogical methods (cf. Foucault, 1969/1972, 1975/1995) to explore Standards- based mathematics education as a "discursive formation" (Foucault, 1969/1972) and the complex power relations (cf. Foucault, 1976/1990) that made it possible for the formation to become The discourse of school mathematics, making others impossible. Data for the exploration includes the Standards documents, earlier histories of the NCTM Standards moment, scholarly and policy literature surrounding the NCTM documents, and oral history interviews with several of the writers of the NCTM documents. The study presents a historical narrative of mathematics education in the 20th century that both contextualizes Standards- based mathematics education and problematizes NCTM's efforts; a key focus is the strategy that NCTM deployed to maintain the viability of Standards-based mathematics education as a discourse. Foucault's (1984) "author function" is used to address the ways that the writers, externalities, and NCTM as an organization "authored" the Standards documents. The study concludes arguing that perpetuating the discursive formation of Standards-based mathematics education is neither good nor bad but only dangerous; therefore, it requires mathematics educators to maintain a sense of pessimistic activism related to present and future reform efforts (cf. Foucault, 1983/1997).

ISBN: 9781303226342Subjects--Topical Terms:

641129
Mathematics education.

An archaeological/genealogical historical analysis of The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics' Standards documents.
LDR:03165nmm a2200289 4500 001 2070941
005 20160628072930.5
008 170521s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303226342
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3571369
035 $a AAI3571369
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bullock, Erika Catherine. $3 3186028
245 1 3 $a An archaeological/genealogical historical analysis of The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics' Standards documents.
300 $a 270 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: David W. Stinson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgia State University, 2013.
520 $a Since the mid-20th century in the United States, there have been several reform movements within mathematics education; each movement has been subject to its own unique socio-cultural and -political forces. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics' (NCTM) Standards documents---Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989), Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991), Assessment Standards for School Mathematics (1995), and Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000)---not only represent the most recent of these reform movements but also the most enduring. Collectively, these documents have formed a discourse (cf. Foucault, 1969/1972)---Standards-based mathematics education---that has guided mathematics education through the 1990s and beyond. This study uses Foucaultian archaeological and genealogical methods (cf. Foucault, 1969/1972, 1975/1995) to explore Standards- based mathematics education as a "discursive formation" (Foucault, 1969/1972) and the complex power relations (cf. Foucault, 1976/1990) that made it possible for the formation to become The discourse of school mathematics, making others impossible. Data for the exploration includes the Standards documents, earlier histories of the NCTM Standards moment, scholarly and policy literature surrounding the NCTM documents, and oral history interviews with several of the writers of the NCTM documents. The study presents a historical narrative of mathematics education in the 20th century that both contextualizes Standards- based mathematics education and problematizes NCTM's efforts; a key focus is the strategy that NCTM deployed to maintain the viability of Standards-based mathematics education as a discourse. Foucault's (1984) "author function" is used to address the ways that the writers, externalities, and NCTM as an organization "authored" the Standards documents. The study concludes arguing that perpetuating the discursive formation of Standards-based mathematics education is neither good nor bad but only dangerous; therefore, it requires mathematics educators to maintain a sense of pessimistic activism related to present and future reform efforts (cf. Foucault, 1983/1997).
590 $a School code: 0079.
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 641129
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0458
710 2 $a Georgia State University. $b Middle-Secondary Education and Instructional Technology. $3 3186029
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-11A(E).
790 $a 0079
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3571369