東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Searching for the Social: Corporate ...

Sabadoz, Cameron.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Searching for the Social: Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Regulation Beyond the State.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Searching for the Social: Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Regulation Beyond the State./
作者:	Sabadoz, Cameron.
面頁冊數:	438 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-06A(E).
標題:	Labor relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3744156
ISBN:	9781339369044

Searching for the Social: Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Regulation Beyond the State.
Sabadoz, Cameron.

Searching for the Social: Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Regulation Beyond the State. - 438 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2015.

The politics of "corporate social responsibility" (CSR) have been suggested as a way to help respond to some of the governance gaps caused by globalization. However, CSR struggles with the question of how critical it can be, and particularly whether it can condemn market agents as subjectively antisocial. CSR is thus perpetually caught between critics on the right who dismiss its real-world seriousness, and critics on the left who worry about its co-optation by the imperatives of business. Both camps suggest that focusing on workplace subjectivity is irrelevant and distracting. Meanwhile, "on the ground", activists plainly do just that. The question is what is lost, in terms of effective governance, when we deny that it is useful to challenge organizational personas and managerial subjectivities. To assess this, I deploy a governmentality analysis to pick apart how CSR politics typically weave together two distinct ways of thinking about regulation. These two "political rationalities" facilitate different discursive framing techniques and different political practices. I argue that CSR's more critical politics often flow from what Foucauldian scholars call "the social" or "social government". "Social government" champions a sense of our interdependence, and often targets the subjectivities of market agents as a way to extra-legally address market abuses. However, theorists have been lamenting the decline of "the social" for decades. What explains the continuing vitality of these supposedly irrelevant politics? I show that recent critical manifestations of CSR politics draw from under-theorized non-state modes of "the social", and are hybridized to fit an increasingly marketized world. These "social" politics can help us build theory about CSR phenomena, as these politics draw much of their normative power from implicit critiques of managerial subjectivities, and reflect only ephemerally any supposed social rules.

ISBN: 9781339369044Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172144
Labor relations.

Searching for the Social: Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Regulation Beyond the State.
LDR:02828nmm a2200277 4500 001 2070103
005 20160602092102.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339369044
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3744156
035 $a AAI3744156
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sabadoz, Cameron. $3 3185131
245 1 0 $a Searching for the Social: Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Regulation Beyond the State.
300 $a 438 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2015.
520 $a The politics of "corporate social responsibility" (CSR) have been suggested as a way to help respond to some of the governance gaps caused by globalization. However, CSR struggles with the question of how critical it can be, and particularly whether it can condemn market agents as subjectively antisocial. CSR is thus perpetually caught between critics on the right who dismiss its real-world seriousness, and critics on the left who worry about its co-optation by the imperatives of business. Both camps suggest that focusing on workplace subjectivity is irrelevant and distracting. Meanwhile, "on the ground", activists plainly do just that. The question is what is lost, in terms of effective governance, when we deny that it is useful to challenge organizational personas and managerial subjectivities. To assess this, I deploy a governmentality analysis to pick apart how CSR politics typically weave together two distinct ways of thinking about regulation. These two "political rationalities" facilitate different discursive framing techniques and different political practices. I argue that CSR's more critical politics often flow from what Foucauldian scholars call "the social" or "social government". "Social government" champions a sense of our interdependence, and often targets the subjectivities of market agents as a way to extra-legally address market abuses. However, theorists have been lamenting the decline of "the social" for decades. What explains the continuing vitality of these supposedly irrelevant politics? I show that recent critical manifestations of CSR politics draw from under-theorized non-state modes of "the social", and are hybridized to fit an increasingly marketized world. These "social" politics can help us build theory about CSR phenomena, as these politics draw much of their normative power from implicit critiques of managerial subjectivities, and reflect only ephemerally any supposed social rules.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Labor relations. $3 3172144
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
690 $a 0629
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $3 1017674
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-06A(E).
790 $a 0779
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3744156