東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Never Silent: Examining Chicana/o Co...

Santos, Ryan Edward.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Never Silent: Examining Chicana/o Community Experiences and Perspectives of School Desegregation Efforts in Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education, 1963-1982.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Never Silent: Examining Chicana/o Community Experiences and Perspectives of School Desegregation Efforts in Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education, 1963-1982./
Author:	Santos, Ryan Edward.
Description:	137 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-05A(E).
Subject:	Education history. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3745517
ISBN:	9781339384948

Never Silent: Examining Chicana/o Community Experiences and Perspectives of School Desegregation Efforts in Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education, 1963-1982.
Santos, Ryan Edward.

Never Silent: Examining Chicana/o Community Experiences and Perspectives of School Desegregation Efforts in Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education, 1963-1982. - 137 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2016.

The Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education (1963-1982) school desegregation lawsuit is a frequently overlooked part of Los Angeles history. Despite a historically large Chicana/o community presence in L.A., traditionally Crawford has been framed as a Black- White issue. This dissertation study of Crawford seeks to expand the traditional discourse of the lawsuit by better understanding Chicana/o community viewpoints and experiences related to desegregation efforts, as well as placing a special emphasis on the remedy phase of the case (1976-1981). During Crawford's nineteen year duration, the contentious development and failed implementation of desegregation plans in LAUSD were affected by the outcomes of increasingly politicized school board and judicial elections, recall campaigns of elected officials, a successful statewide ballot initiative to alter the California constitution (Prop.1, 1979), and changes in the interpretation of desegregation law by the courts. This review of Crawford also provides important historical insight into strategies and policies that were effective/ineffective in the struggle to desegregate Los Angeles schools. A Critical Race History in Education theoretical framework is used to guide this study and underscores the historical importance of identifying and acknowledging intersections between race, gender, class and other forms of oppression (e.g. language, phenotype, immigration status, sexual orientation). Additionally, the closely related concepts of racial realism, interest convergence, and legal indeterminacy were utilized to help us better understand and interpret a history of Crawford. Primary source data for this study were found through archival research conducted in special collections from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), and Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF). Additionally, two oral interviews have been conducted with educational experts who were involved in Crawford litigation. As a result of these two robust forms of data, this research on Crawford is able to document and call attention to the ways in which community members, along with socio-cultural and historical context, shape school district educational policy.

ISBN: 9781339384948Subjects--Topical Terms:

3171959
Education history.

Never Silent: Examining Chicana/o Community Experiences and Perspectives of School Desegregation Efforts in Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education, 1963-1982.
LDR:03370nmm a2200301 4500 001 2069543
005 20160513094005.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339384948
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3745517
035 $a AAI3745517
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Santos, Ryan Edward. $3 3184564
245 1 0 $a Never Silent: Examining Chicana/o Community Experiences and Perspectives of School Desegregation Efforts in Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education, 1963-1982.
300 $a 137 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Daniel G. Solorzano.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2016.
520 $a The Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education (1963-1982) school desegregation lawsuit is a frequently overlooked part of Los Angeles history. Despite a historically large Chicana/o community presence in L.A., traditionally Crawford has been framed as a Black- White issue. This dissertation study of Crawford seeks to expand the traditional discourse of the lawsuit by better understanding Chicana/o community viewpoints and experiences related to desegregation efforts, as well as placing a special emphasis on the remedy phase of the case (1976-1981). During Crawford's nineteen year duration, the contentious development and failed implementation of desegregation plans in LAUSD were affected by the outcomes of increasingly politicized school board and judicial elections, recall campaigns of elected officials, a successful statewide ballot initiative to alter the California constitution (Prop.1, 1979), and changes in the interpretation of desegregation law by the courts. This review of Crawford also provides important historical insight into strategies and policies that were effective/ineffective in the struggle to desegregate Los Angeles schools. A Critical Race History in Education theoretical framework is used to guide this study and underscores the historical importance of identifying and acknowledging intersections between race, gender, class and other forms of oppression (e.g. language, phenotype, immigration status, sexual orientation). Additionally, the closely related concepts of racial realism, interest convergence, and legal indeterminacy were utilized to help us better understand and interpret a history of Crawford. Primary source data for this study were found through archival research conducted in special collections from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), and Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF). Additionally, two oral interviews have been conducted with educational experts who were involved in Crawford litigation. As a result of these two robust forms of data, this research on Crawford is able to document and call attention to the ways in which community members, along with socio-cultural and historical context, shape school district educational policy.
590 $a School code: 0031.
650 4 $a Education history. $3 3171959
650 4 $a Ethnic studies. $2 bicssc $3 1556779
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Hispanic American studies. $3 2122745
690 $a 0520
690 $a 0631
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0737
710 2 $a University of California, Los Angeles. $b Education. $3 2101790
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-05A(E).
790 $a 0031
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3745517