東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Accuracy of Professional Self-Report...

Richter Lagha, Regina Anne.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Accuracy of Professional Self-Reports: Medical Student Self-Report and the Scoring of Professional Competence.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Accuracy of Professional Self-Reports: Medical Student Self-Report and the Scoring of Professional Competence./
作者:	Richter Lagha, Regina Anne.
面頁冊數:	166 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-04A(E).
標題:	Educational tests & measurements. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3607674
ISBN:	9781303653230

Accuracy of Professional Self-Reports: Medical Student Self-Report and the Scoring of Professional Competence.
Richter Lagha, Regina Anne.

Accuracy of Professional Self-Reports: Medical Student Self-Report and the Scoring of Professional Competence. - 166 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Self-report is currently used as an indicator of professional practice in a variety of fields, including medicine and education. Important to consider, therefore, is the ability of self-report to accurately capture professional practice. This study investigated how well professionals' self-reports of behavior agreed with an expert observer's reports of those same behaviors. While this study explored self-report in the context of medical professionals, this topic is equally important to the measurement of teacher practices.

ISBN: 9781303653230Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168483
Educational tests & measurements.

Accuracy of Professional Self-Reports: Medical Student Self-Report and the Scoring of Professional Competence.
LDR:03520nmm a2200337 4500 001 2061030
005 20150918092534.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303653230
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3607674
035 $a AAI3607674
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Richter Lagha, Regina Anne. $3 3175248
245 1 0 $a Accuracy of Professional Self-Reports: Medical Student Self-Report and the Scoring of Professional Competence.
300 $a 166 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Noreen M. Webb.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Self-report is currently used as an indicator of professional practice in a variety of fields, including medicine and education. Important to consider, therefore, is the ability of self-report to accurately capture professional practice. This study investigated how well professionals' self-reports of behavior agreed with an expert observer's reports of those same behaviors. While this study explored self-report in the context of medical professionals, this topic is equally important to the measurement of teacher practices.
520 $a This study investigated agreement between: 1) medical student self-report and expert rater documentation of a clinical encounter; and 2) standardized patient (an actor highly-trained to portray a patient) and expert rater documentation of medical student performance. Additionally, this study investigated whether levels of agreement depended on the context and content of behaviors, features of the examination, or characteristics of the professional.
520 $a Performance data were analyzed from a stratified random sample of 75 fourth-year medical students who completed a clinical competence examination in 2012. Students rotated through a series of 15-minute encounters, called stations, interviewing a standardized patient in each. Medical students were instructed to: 1) obtain the patient's history; 2) conduct a physical examination; and 3) discuss potential diagnoses. Ratings of student performance were collected from the medical student self-reports, the SP checklists, and the expert rater's documentation of the encounters. Analyses focused on the 4-7 behavioral items in each of the three stations studied that were considered critical to patient care.
520 $a Comparison of the three sources of ratings revealed marked differences. Most importantly, medical students' self-reports did not agree highly with the expert's reports. Medical students both under-reported and over-reported a substantial number of critical action items with level of agreement varying by station and the nature of the behavior. Due to medical student tendency to under-report behaviors, use of self-report to score performance would result in a large number of students falsely identified as failing the examination.
520 $a This study discusses causes of medical student under- and over-report and recommends strategies for improvement. The study also addresses implications of findings for the use of self-report among teachers, citing specific examples.
590 $a School code: 0031.
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0564
710 2 $a University of California, Los Angeles. $b Education 0249. $3 2036364
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-04A(E).
790 $a 0031
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3607674