東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Preservice Candidates' Rating of Eff...

Hunt, Christopher Lee.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Preservice Candidates' Rating of Effectiveness in Agricultural Education through Structured Communication with Cooperating Teachers.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Preservice Candidates' Rating of Effectiveness in Agricultural Education through Structured Communication with Cooperating Teachers./
作者:	Hunt, Christopher Lee.
面頁冊數:	94 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International52-04(E).
標題:	Agricultural education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1549406
ISBN:	9781303616747

Preservice Candidates' Rating of Effectiveness in Agricultural Education through Structured Communication with Cooperating Teachers.
Hunt, Christopher Lee.

Preservice Candidates' Rating of Effectiveness in Agricultural Education through Structured Communication with Cooperating Teachers. - 94 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-04.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Arkansas, 2013.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The relationship between cooperating teacher and student has been found as one of the key elements that affect the overall teaching efficacy of student teachers and their decision to enter the teaching field after graduation (Edgar, 2007; Edgar, Roberts, & Murphy, 2011,2008; Kasperbauer et al., 2007a; Roberts, Greiman, Murphy, Ricketts, Harlin, & Briers 2009; Roberts, Harlin, & Briers, 2007, Roberts, Harlin, & Ricketts, 2006; Roberts Mowen, Edgar, Harlin & Briers, 2007, Stripling, Ricketts, Roberts & Harlin, 2008; Wolf, 2011; Wolf et al., 2010). Therefore, determining impacts towards teaching efficacy during the student teaching experience could play a vital role in future teachers' success. The purpose of this study was to assess teaching efficacy and the relationship between student teacher and cooperating teacher through a structured communication instrument at multiple universities. Data was collected from participants of this study on three variables; teaching efficacy, communication, and relationship.

ISBN: 9781303616747Subjects--Topical Terms:

612126
Agricultural education.

Preservice Candidates' Rating of Effectiveness in Agricultural Education through Structured Communication with Cooperating Teachers.
LDR:03227nmm a2200313 4500 001 2058456
005 20150716112032.5
008 170521s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303616747
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1549406
035 $a AAI1549406
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hunt, Christopher Lee. $3 3172403
245 1 0 $a Preservice Candidates' Rating of Effectiveness in Agricultural Education through Structured Communication with Cooperating Teachers.
300 $a 94 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-04.
500 $a Adviser: Don W. Edgar.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of Arkansas, 2013.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The relationship between cooperating teacher and student has been found as one of the key elements that affect the overall teaching efficacy of student teachers and their decision to enter the teaching field after graduation (Edgar, 2007; Edgar, Roberts, & Murphy, 2011,2008; Kasperbauer et al., 2007a; Roberts, Greiman, Murphy, Ricketts, Harlin, & Briers 2009; Roberts, Harlin, & Briers, 2007, Roberts, Harlin, & Ricketts, 2006; Roberts Mowen, Edgar, Harlin & Briers, 2007, Stripling, Ricketts, Roberts & Harlin, 2008; Wolf, 2011; Wolf et al., 2010). Therefore, determining impacts towards teaching efficacy during the student teaching experience could play a vital role in future teachers' success. The purpose of this study was to assess teaching efficacy and the relationship between student teacher and cooperating teacher through a structured communication instrument at multiple universities. Data was collected from participants of this study on three variables; teaching efficacy, communication, and relationship.
520 $a Data to address teaching efficacy was collected during the 2012 and 2013 spring semester at two universities {University of Arkansas (N = 27) and the University of Georgia (N = 32)}. To determine if a difference existed between universities based on teaching efficacy an ANOVA was used. The overall model was not significant (Between Groups, f = .568 and p = .687). The null hypothesis was accepted. To determine if a difference existed in student teachers perceptions bet multiple universities towards teaching an ANOVA was used. The overall model was not significant (Between Groups, f = 1.631 and p = .180). The null hypothesis was accepted. To determine if there was difference in teaching efficacy and student teachers/cooperating teacher relationship a MANOVA was used to test the hypothesis. The overall model was not significant therefore the null hypothesis was retained. Further research should be conducted to see the direct effects of the behaviors, personal factors, and the environment of preservice teaching. It is also suggested that future research be conducted to define the specifics of the behavioral factors, environmental, and personal factors in terms of agriculture education.
590 $a School code: 0011.
650 4 $a Agricultural education. $3 612126
650 4 $a Early childhood education. $3 518817
650 4 $a Secondary education. $3 2122779
690 $a 0517
690 $a 0518
690 $a 0533
710 2 $a University of Arkansas. $b Agricultural and Extension Education. $3 2093020
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 52-04(E).
790 $a 0011
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1549406