東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A study of the relationship between ...

Agnant Rogers, Myriam.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A study of the relationship between professional development evaluation and middle school mathematics achievement.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A study of the relationship between professional development evaluation and middle school mathematics achievement./
作者:	Agnant Rogers, Myriam.
面頁冊數:	192 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-02A(E).
標題:	Education, Evaluation. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3599443
ISBN:	9781303487170

A study of the relationship between professional development evaluation and middle school mathematics achievement.
Agnant Rogers, Myriam.

A study of the relationship between professional development evaluation and middle school mathematics achievement. - 192 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (D.Ed.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2013.

As a result of poor student performance, professional development has emerged as a key strategy for improving instruction and achievement. In times of reduced resources and increased accountability, schools must evaluate their efforts in order to make sound decisions about policy and practice. This mixed method study was designed to investigate professional development evaluation practices and whether a relationship exists between professional development evaluation and math achievement in two groups of middle schools in one county school district. One group of middle schools met state standards in mathematics and the other group of schools did not meet state standards. The study sought to assess the perceptions of middle school principals, staff development teachers, and district level staff development instructional specialists/directors regarding the five levels of professional development evaluation: participant reactions, participant learning, organization support and change, participants' use of new knowledge and skills, and impact on student learning outcomes. According to Guskey (2002), the levels of evaluation are sequential and hierarchical and in order to increase the chance for successful impact on student achievement, all levels must be carefully considered in planning professional development experiences for teachers.

ISBN: 9781303487170Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669638
Education, Evaluation.

A study of the relationship between professional development evaluation and middle school mathematics achievement.
LDR:03538nam a2200325 4500 001 1962400
005 20140805141055.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303487170
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3599443
035 $a AAI3599443
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Agnant Rogers, Myriam. $3 2098471
245 1 2 $a A study of the relationship between professional development evaluation and middle school mathematics achievement.
300 $a 192 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Carol S. Parham.
502 $a Thesis (D.Ed.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2013.
520 $a As a result of poor student performance, professional development has emerged as a key strategy for improving instruction and achievement. In times of reduced resources and increased accountability, schools must evaluate their efforts in order to make sound decisions about policy and practice. This mixed method study was designed to investigate professional development evaluation practices and whether a relationship exists between professional development evaluation and math achievement in two groups of middle schools in one county school district. One group of middle schools met state standards in mathematics and the other group of schools did not meet state standards. The study sought to assess the perceptions of middle school principals, staff development teachers, and district level staff development instructional specialists/directors regarding the five levels of professional development evaluation: participant reactions, participant learning, organization support and change, participants' use of new knowledge and skills, and impact on student learning outcomes. According to Guskey (2002), the levels of evaluation are sequential and hierarchical and in order to increase the chance for successful impact on student achievement, all levels must be carefully considered in planning professional development experiences for teachers.
520 $a These data were gathered through the use of a survey and focus group interviews . A survey instrument was designed to solicit perceptions of the levels of professional development evaluation in schools. There was no statistically significant difference between principals and staff development teachers in the schools that met state standards in mathematics and those who did not. The researcher conducted a one way analysis of variance of differences between the perceptions of professional development evaluation practices of principals, staff development teachers, and instructional specialists/directors in both met and non-met schools. Focus groups were held with principals, staff development teachers, and staff development instructional specialists/directors to identify the types and levels of professional development evaluation across middle schools.
520 $a This study has training, policy and practice implications for middle school principals and staff development teachers as they implement professional development evaluation efforts aimed at improving middle school mathematics. It is expected that this research will assist school systems in their school improvement efforts.
590 $a School code: 0117.
650 4 $a Education, Evaluation. $3 1669638
650 4 $a Education, Leadership. $3 1035576
650 4 $a Education, Middle School. $3 1030813
650 4 $a Education, Mathematics. $3 1017588
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0450
690 $a 0280
710 2 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $b Education Policy, and Leadership. $3 1022048
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-02A(E).
790 $a 0117
791 $a D.Ed.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3599443