東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

New format, same old story?: An anal...

Lathan, Jamie L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

New format, same old story?: An analysis of traditional and digital U.S. history textbook accounts of slavery.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	New format, same old story?: An analysis of traditional and digital U.S. history textbook accounts of slavery./
作者:	Lathan, Jamie L.
面頁冊數:	237 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-10A(E).
標題:	Education, Social Sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3562921
ISBN:	9781303108167

New format, same old story?: An analysis of traditional and digital U.S. history textbook accounts of slavery.
Lathan, Jamie L.

New format, same old story?: An analysis of traditional and digital U.S. history textbook accounts of slavery. - 237 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2013.

While the distortions and omissions in traditional U. S. history textbook accounts of slavery have been well documented (Alexander, 2002; Brown & Brown, 2010; Banks, 1969; Council on Interracial Books for Children, 1977; Elson, 1964; Gordy & Pritchard, 1995; Kane, 1970; Kochlin, 1998; Washburn, 1997), no study has analyzed digital U. S. history textbooks for those same distortions. Given the digital history affordances of increased accessibility of primary source documents (Lee, 2002), multiple perspectives of historical narratives (Ayers, 1999), flexibility in presentation forms (Cohen & Rosenzweig, 2005), and integration of formerly marginalized historical accounts (Bolick, 2006), it should follow that digital U. S. history textbook accounts of slavery eliminate, or at least minimize, the stereotypes, distortions, and omissions. After conducting a content-based, hypertext-based, image-based, and multimedia-based content analysis of traditional and digital U. S. history textbook accounts of slavery, it is clear that digital U. S. history textbooks do not take advantage of the affordances of digital history and, consequently, continue to perpetuate the distortions and omissions of the traditional textbooks. Using Critical Race Theory, New Literacies, and Hypertext Theory as an interpretive lens, the findings of the study highlight both the disappointment and hope of the untapped potential of digital U. S. history textbooks.

ISBN: 9781303108167Subjects--Topical Terms:

1019148
Education, Social Sciences.

New format, same old story?: An analysis of traditional and digital U.S. history textbook accounts of slavery.
LDR:02376nam a2200277 4500 001 1962348
005 20140805141050.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303108167
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3562921
035 $a AAI3562921
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lathan, Jamie L. $3 2098411
245 1 0 $a New format, same old story?: An analysis of traditional and digital U.S. history textbook accounts of slavery.
300 $a 237 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Cheryl Bolick.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2013.
520 $a While the distortions and omissions in traditional U. S. history textbook accounts of slavery have been well documented (Alexander, 2002; Brown & Brown, 2010; Banks, 1969; Council on Interracial Books for Children, 1977; Elson, 1964; Gordy & Pritchard, 1995; Kane, 1970; Kochlin, 1998; Washburn, 1997), no study has analyzed digital U. S. history textbooks for those same distortions. Given the digital history affordances of increased accessibility of primary source documents (Lee, 2002), multiple perspectives of historical narratives (Ayers, 1999), flexibility in presentation forms (Cohen & Rosenzweig, 2005), and integration of formerly marginalized historical accounts (Bolick, 2006), it should follow that digital U. S. history textbook accounts of slavery eliminate, or at least minimize, the stereotypes, distortions, and omissions. After conducting a content-based, hypertext-based, image-based, and multimedia-based content analysis of traditional and digital U. S. history textbook accounts of slavery, it is clear that digital U. S. history textbooks do not take advantage of the affordances of digital history and, consequently, continue to perpetuate the distortions and omissions of the traditional textbooks. Using Critical Race Theory, New Literacies, and Hypertext Theory as an interpretive lens, the findings of the study highlight both the disappointment and hope of the untapped potential of digital U. S. history textbooks.
590 $a School code: 0153.
650 4 $a Education, Social Sciences. $3 1019148
650 4 $a Education, Technology of. $3 1018012
690 $a 0534
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $b Education: Doctorate/Master's in Education. $3 1023301
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-10A(E).
790 $a 0153
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3562921