東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The debates between Daoists and Budd...

Assandri, Friederike.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The debates between Daoists and Buddhists in the early Tang and the Chongxuan teaching of Daoism: A study of Daoxuans Ji gujin Fo Dao lunheng (T 2104) (German text, China).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The debates between Daoists and Buddhists in the early Tang and the Chongxuan teaching of Daoism: A study of Daoxuans Ji gujin Fo Dao lunheng (T 2104) (German text, China)./
作者:	Assandri, Friederike.
面頁冊數:	712 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-11, Section: A, page: 4088.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-11A.
標題:	Religion, History of. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3111333

The debates between Daoists and Buddhists in the early Tang and the Chongxuan teaching of Daoism: A study of Daoxuans Ji gujin Fo Dao lunheng (T 2104) (German text, China).
Assandri, Friederike.

The debates between Daoists and Buddhists in the early Tang and the Chongxuan teaching of Daoism: A study of Daoxuans Ji gujin Fo Dao lunheng (T 2104) (German text, China). - 712 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-11, Section: A, page: 4088.

Thesis (Dr.Phil.)--Ruprecht-Karls-Universitaet Heidelberg (Germany), 2002.

Subject of the thesis are the debates between Buddhists and Daoists at the court of the early Tang described in Daoxuans Ji gujin Fo Dao lunheng, T 2104, 3–4.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017471
Religion, History of.

The debates between Daoists and Buddhists in the early Tang and the Chongxuan teaching of Daoism: A study of Daoxuans Ji gujin Fo Dao lunheng (T 2104) (German text, China).
LDR:03139nmm 2200349 4500 001 1857053
005 20040806102500.5
008 130614s2002 ger d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3111333
035 $a AAI3111333
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Assandri, Friederike. $3 1944792
245 1 0 $a The debates between Daoists and Buddhists in the early Tang and the Chongxuan teaching of Daoism: A study of Daoxuans Ji gujin Fo Dao lunheng (T 2104) (German text, China).
300 $a 712 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-11, Section: A, page: 4088.
500 $a Adviser: Rudolf G. Wagner.
502 $a Thesis (Dr.Phil.)--Ruprecht-Karls-Universitaet Heidelberg (Germany), 2002.
520 $a Subject of the thesis are the debates between Buddhists and Daoists at the court of the early Tang described in Daoxuans Ji gujin Fo Dao lunheng, T 2104, 3–4.
520 $a We present an annotated translation of nine debates with an introduction into the institutional and historical background.
520 $a Subjects of research: (1) Formal aspects and regulations of the court debates. With the information about the rules and regulations of the court debates translated it was possible to reconstruct an outline of the regular proceedings of an interreligious court debate. (2) Conventions of rhetoric. Buddhism introduced into China some of the conventions of debate developed in India. We introduce some of the texts translated into Chinese that deal with these conventions. The analysis of the debates shows that the Buddhists were familiar with these texts.
520 $a We analyze rhetoric and logic in the debates: <italic>yinming</italic> logic, the logic of <italic>reductio ad absurdum</italic>, the <italic>prasanga </italic> method introduced into China with Madhyamika-Buddhism, the use of analogy and the use of quotations. (3) Chongxuanxue and Court Daoism. The Daoists participants in the debates can be considered representatives of the ‘<italic>chongxuanxue</italic>’.
520 $a The development of <italic>chongxuanxue</italic> is analyzed as part of the formation of ‘Gentry-’ or ‘Court-Daoism’, considering its role in integrating Daoism, its function in the context of inner-Daoist conflicts as well as in the confrontation with Buddhism in the environment of the gentry and the court.
520 $a The analysis covers not only the issue of the introduction of the philosophical method of the logic of the tetra lemma into the interpretation of the Laozi, but also the role of the chongxuan interpretation for the introduction of Mahayanistic sotenological notions of salvation through understanding into the reading of the Laozi—thus proving that those soteriological notions were always part of Daoism.
590 $a School code: 0528.
650 4 $a Religion, History of. $3 1017471
650 4 $a History, Asia, Australia and Oceania. $3 626624
650 4 $a Religion, Philosophy of. $3 1017774
690 $a 0320
690 $a 0332
690 $a 0322
710 2 0 $a Ruprecht-Karls-Universitaet Heidelberg (Germany). $3 1933187
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-11A.
790 1 0 $a Wagner, Rudolf G., $e advisor
790 $a 0528
791 $a Dr.Phil.
792 $a 2002
793 $a German
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3111333