東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Beyond birth control: Catholic respo...

Leon, Sharon Mara.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Beyond birth control: Catholic responses to the eugenics movement in the United States, 1900--1950.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Beyond birth control: Catholic responses to the eugenics movement in the United States, 1900--1950./
作者:	Leon, Sharon Mara.
面頁冊數:	340 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-08, Section: A, page: 3027.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-08A.
標題:	Religion, History of. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3142627
ISBN:	0496005227

Beyond birth control: Catholic responses to the eugenics movement in the United States, 1900--1950.
Leon, Sharon Mara.

Beyond birth control: Catholic responses to the eugenics movement in the United States, 1900--1950. - 340 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-08, Section: A, page: 3027.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2004.

At its heart, the eugenics movement was an attempt on the part of scientists and reformers to shape the American population by regulating the ability of particular persons to reproduce. This study explores how and why U.S. Roman Catholics provided the major voices of opposition to that movement during the first half of the twentieth century. Fundamentally, the conflict between Catholics and eugenicists was one of contradictory worldviews. Though the dispute between eugenicists and Catholics stemmed from a clash of different conceptions of society and community, those worldviews played out on the ground in practical terms as they fought over those particular policy initiatives, such as immigration restriction, birth control for the impoverished, anti-miscegenation legislation, involuntary sterilization for the "unfit," and health requirements for marriage certificates. On the one hand, advocates of the eugenics movement saw the science of heredity as providing the key to transforming American society by facilitating the elimination of "unfitness" and congenital disease, both physical and mental, and by fostering the growth of a vigorous and morally upright population. The eugenics social ideology promised progressive racial improvement that would culminate in fulfilling America's national destiny. On the other hand, Catholic social teaching envisioned a society in which individuals were invested with natural rights that took precedent over any commitment to progressive social development. Viewing the nuclear family as the basic social unit, Catholic teaching held that the state had no jurisdiction over the formation of families and that to deprive an individual of the right to reproduce was to violate a basic human right. This stance tapped into an extensive teaching on natural law that was based on scripture, tradition and human reason. Given the philosophical differences contained in these two worldviews, when eugenicists and Catholics talked about policy initiatives they discussed far more than science and religion; they discussed social relations, politics, culture, gender, race, and class. This dissertation challenges conventional scholarly understandings of the eugenics movement, nationalism, citizenship, and Catholic politics, while deepening our understanding of the adjustment of Catholicism to American conditions.

ISBN: 0496005227Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017471
Religion, History of.

Beyond birth control: Catholic responses to the eugenics movement in the United States, 1900--1950.
LDR:03356nmm 2200301 4500 001 1840383
005 20050721103004.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
020 $a 0496005227
035 $a (UnM)AAI3142627
035 $a AAI3142627
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Leon, Sharon Mara. $3 1928724
245 1 0 $a Beyond birth control: Catholic responses to the eugenics movement in the United States, 1900--1950.
300 $a 340 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-08, Section: A, page: 3027.
500 $a Advisers: Elaine Tyler May; Riv-Ellen Prell.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2004.
520 $a At its heart, the eugenics movement was an attempt on the part of scientists and reformers to shape the American population by regulating the ability of particular persons to reproduce. This study explores how and why U.S. Roman Catholics provided the major voices of opposition to that movement during the first half of the twentieth century. Fundamentally, the conflict between Catholics and eugenicists was one of contradictory worldviews. Though the dispute between eugenicists and Catholics stemmed from a clash of different conceptions of society and community, those worldviews played out on the ground in practical terms as they fought over those particular policy initiatives, such as immigration restriction, birth control for the impoverished, anti-miscegenation legislation, involuntary sterilization for the "unfit," and health requirements for marriage certificates. On the one hand, advocates of the eugenics movement saw the science of heredity as providing the key to transforming American society by facilitating the elimination of "unfitness" and congenital disease, both physical and mental, and by fostering the growth of a vigorous and morally upright population. The eugenics social ideology promised progressive racial improvement that would culminate in fulfilling America's national destiny. On the other hand, Catholic social teaching envisioned a society in which individuals were invested with natural rights that took precedent over any commitment to progressive social development. Viewing the nuclear family as the basic social unit, Catholic teaching held that the state had no jurisdiction over the formation of families and that to deprive an individual of the right to reproduce was to violate a basic human right. This stance tapped into an extensive teaching on natural law that was based on scripture, tradition and human reason. Given the philosophical differences contained in these two worldviews, when eugenicists and Catholics talked about policy initiatives they discussed far more than science and religion; they discussed social relations, politics, culture, gender, race, and class. This dissertation challenges conventional scholarly understandings of the eugenics movement, nationalism, citizenship, and Catholic politics, while deepening our understanding of the adjustment of Catholicism to American conditions.
590 $a School code: 0130.
650 4 $a Religion, History of. $3 1017471
650 4 $a American Studies. $3 1017604
650 4 $a History of Science. $3 896972
690 $a 0320
690 $a 0323
690 $a 0585
710 2 0 $a University of Minnesota. $3 676231
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-08A.
790 1 0 $a May, Elaine Tyler, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Prell, Riv-Ellen, $e advisor
790 $a 0130
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3142627