東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Historical roots of the extraordinar...

Skrocki, Michael K.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Historical roots of the extraordinary form of marriage in the 1990 Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium as found in the imperial legislation of Justinian, Constantine V and Leo VI.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Historical roots of the extraordinary form of marriage in the 1990 Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium as found in the imperial legislation of Justinian, Constantine V and Leo VI./
Author:	Skrocki, Michael K.
Description:	235 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-12, Section: A, page: 4578.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-12A.
Subject:	Religion, History of. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3246960

Historical roots of the extraordinary form of marriage in the 1990 Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium as found in the imperial legislation of Justinian, Constantine V and Leo VI.
Skrocki, Michael K.

Historical roots of the extraordinary form of marriage in the 1990 Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium as found in the imperial legislation of Justinian, Constantine V and Leo VI. - 235 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-12, Section: A, page: 4578.

Thesis (J.C.D.)--The Catholic University of America, 2007.

The Byzantine Emperor had both civil and ecclesiastical roles, promulgating legislation for both. Justinian's Corpus Iuris Civilis, promulgated c. 530, mandated a form for marriage not requiring a priestly blessing. The law code of Constantine V, promulgated c. 741, authorized four valid forms, only one of which required the blessing. The Novellae of Emperor Leo VI, promulgated c. 893, mandate the priestly blessing as the only form for marriage.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017471
Religion, History of.

Historical roots of the extraordinary form of marriage in the 1990 Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium as found in the imperial legislation of Justinian, Constantine V and Leo VI.
LDR:03254nmm 2200325 4500 001 1835349
005 20071217104323.5
008 130610s2007 eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI3246960
035 $a AAI3246960
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Skrocki, Michael K. $3 1923974
245 1 0 $a Historical roots of the extraordinary form of marriage in the 1990 Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium as found in the imperial legislation of Justinian, Constantine V and Leo VI.
300 $a 235 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-12, Section: A, page: 4578.
500 $a Adviser: Kenneth Pennington.
502 $a Thesis (J.C.D.)--The Catholic University of America, 2007.
520 $a The Byzantine Emperor had both civil and ecclesiastical roles, promulgating legislation for both. Justinian's Corpus Iuris Civilis, promulgated c. 530, mandated a form for marriage not requiring a priestly blessing. The law code of Constantine V, promulgated c. 741, authorized four valid forms, only one of which required the blessing. The Novellae of Emperor Leo VI, promulgated c. 893, mandate the priestly blessing as the only form for marriage.
520 $a This single form for marriage remains the norm among the Orthodox Churches. Among the Eastern Catholic Churches, the requirement of the priestly blessing for marriage has been confirmed up to the early 19th century. Since that time, however, the influence of the Western Church has reduced the stringency with which this tradition is applied. The use of an extraordinary form, not requiring the blessing, was mandated by the Roman Curia within certain of the eastern churches at various times, becoming universal for eastern catholics with canon 89 of Pius XII's 1949 motu proprio, Crebrae allatae.
520 $a Vatican II's Orientalium ecclesiarum urged Eastern Catholic Churches to return to and preserve their heritage---their proper traditions and liturgical rites. The 1974 Guidelines for the Revision of the Code reaffirmed this mandate and emphasized the "oriental character" of the forthcoming eastern Code of Canon Law. However, canon 832 of the 1990 Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches (CCEO), restates canon 89 of Crebrae allatae. This is viewed by some as foreign to the sacramental tradition of the East, and is among the points of contention in ecumenical dialogue with the Orthodox Churches.
520 $a Method. This dissertation will examine the marriage legislation of the three major Byzantine law codes of the first millennium with an emphasis on the required form(s) of marriage. It attempts to show that a valid form of marriage not requiring the sacramental involvement of a priest is not foreign to the tradition of the Byzantine East before it was formally outlawed in the late ninth century. Finally, it will also examine the impact of this legislation on the extraordinary form of marriage found in canon 832 of the 1990 CCEO.
590 $a School code: 0043.
650 4 $a Religion, History of. $3 1017471
650 4 $a History, Church. $3 1020179
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a History, Ancient. $3 516261
690 $a 0320
690 $a 0330
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0579
710 2 0 $a The Catholic University of America. $3 1019220
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-12A.
790 1 0 $a Pennington, Kenneth, $e advisor
790 $a 0043
791 $a J.C.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3246960