東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Civic responsibility and research un...

Thornton, Courtney H.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Civic responsibility and research universities: Ideology, culture and action.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Civic responsibility and research universities: Ideology, culture and action./
作者:	Thornton, Courtney H.
面頁冊數:	203 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-09, Section: A, page: 3330.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-09A.
標題:	Education, Social Sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3233066
ISBN:	9780542857065

Civic responsibility and research universities: Ideology, culture and action.
Thornton, Courtney H.

Civic responsibility and research universities: Ideology, culture and action. - 203 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-09, Section: A, page: 3330.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--North Carolina State University, 2006.

Civic responsibility is an important ideal of higher education that is rarely considered through a cultural and theoretical lens. Swidler's (1986) framework linking ideology, culture and action provided a means of studying civic responsibility at two research universities, the University of Virginia (UVA) and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC). The purposes of the study were (a) to understand dominant institutional beliefs about civic responsibility at two research universities, and (b) to understand how their institutional cultures contribute to unique institutional approaches to civic responsibility, specifically for the areas of student involvement and development. This ethnographic study examined campus ideologies and cultural forms that addressed five dimensions of civic responsibility: (a) knowledge and support of democratic values, systems and processes, (b) desire to act beneficially in community and for its members, (c) use of knowledge and skills for societal benefit, (d) appreciation for and interest in those unlike self, and (e) personal accountability. Data collection involved interviews, field observations and document analysis at both campuses. Student questionnaires and site summary reviewers were used to ensure trustworthiness of the findings. Data was analyzed for each site independently, and then a cross-site analysis was conducted. The ideologies, cultures and actions specific to the two institutions aligned with Swidler's framework and yielded two unique institutional approaches to civic responsibility, namely the "test bed" and "role model" approaches. The significance of the findings from the cross-site analysis are multi-fold, with implications for both organization studies and student development.

ISBN: 9780542857065Subjects--Topical Terms:

1019148
Education, Social Sciences.

Civic responsibility and research universities: Ideology, culture and action.
LDR:02691nmm 2200289 4500 001 1831929
005 20070529074754.5
008 130610s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542857065
035 $a (UnM)AAI3233066
035 $a AAI3233066
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Thornton, Courtney H. $3 1920691
245 1 0 $a Civic responsibility and research universities: Ideology, culture and action.
300 $a 203 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-09, Section: A, page: 3330.
500 $a Adviser: Audrey J. Jaeger.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--North Carolina State University, 2006.
520 $a Civic responsibility is an important ideal of higher education that is rarely considered through a cultural and theoretical lens. Swidler's (1986) framework linking ideology, culture and action provided a means of studying civic responsibility at two research universities, the University of Virginia (UVA) and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC). The purposes of the study were (a) to understand dominant institutional beliefs about civic responsibility at two research universities, and (b) to understand how their institutional cultures contribute to unique institutional approaches to civic responsibility, specifically for the areas of student involvement and development. This ethnographic study examined campus ideologies and cultural forms that addressed five dimensions of civic responsibility: (a) knowledge and support of democratic values, systems and processes, (b) desire to act beneficially in community and for its members, (c) use of knowledge and skills for societal benefit, (d) appreciation for and interest in those unlike self, and (e) personal accountability. Data collection involved interviews, field observations and document analysis at both campuses. Student questionnaires and site summary reviewers were used to ensure trustworthiness of the findings. Data was analyzed for each site independently, and then a cross-site analysis was conducted. The ideologies, cultures and actions specific to the two institutions aligned with Swidler's framework and yielded two unique institutional approaches to civic responsibility, namely the "test bed" and "role model" approaches. The significance of the findings from the cross-site analysis are multi-fold, with implications for both organization studies and student development.
590 $a School code: 0155.
650 4 $a Education, Social Sciences. $3 1019148
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
690 $a 0534
690 $a 0703
690 $a 0745
710 2 0 $a North Carolina State University. $3 1018772
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-09A.
790 1 0 $a Jaeger, Audrey J., $e advisor
790 $a 0155
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3233066