東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A descriptive study of select higher...

Lasater, W. David.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A descriptive study of select higher education fund raising programs: Centralized, hybrid and decentralized.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A descriptive study of select higher education fund raising programs: Centralized, hybrid and decentralized./
作者:	Lasater, W. David.
面頁冊數:	136 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-08, Section: A, page: 2903.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-08A.
標題:	Education, Finance. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3232573
ISBN:	9780542849954

A descriptive study of select higher education fund raising programs: Centralized, hybrid and decentralized.
Lasater, W. David.

A descriptive study of select higher education fund raising programs: Centralized, hybrid and decentralized. - 136 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-08, Section: A, page: 2903.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2006.

This quantitative study was undertaken to explore and describe the organization of fund raising programs among Carnegie 2000 classified doctoral/research and master's institutions in the United States. The purpose was to obtain a comprehensive understanding of how college and university development operations are structured.

ISBN: 9780542849954Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020300
Education, Finance.

A descriptive study of select higher education fund raising programs: Centralized, hybrid and decentralized.
LDR:03250nmm 2200313 4500 001 1829300
005 20071029083136.5
008 130610s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542849954
035 $a (UMI)AAI3232573
035 $a AAI3232573
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Lasater, W. David. $3 1918166
245 1 2 $a A descriptive study of select higher education fund raising programs: Centralized, hybrid and decentralized.
300 $a 136 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-08, Section: A, page: 2903.
500 $a Adviser: Eugene R. Tempel.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2006.
520 $a This quantitative study was undertaken to explore and describe the organization of fund raising programs among Carnegie 2000 classified doctoral/research and master's institutions in the United States. The purpose was to obtain a comprehensive understanding of how college and university development operations are structured.
520 $a In order to accomplish the purpose of this study, a number of key questions are examined: (1) What organizational structures exist in higher education fund raising programs today? (2) Is there a difference in the predominant fund raising organizational structure among different types of institutions? (3) What institutional characteristics are associated with different fund raising organizational structures?
520 $a The study results indicate that among research, doctoral and masters degree granting higher education institutions, a centralized fund raising organizational structure is predominant, while hybrid was the second most common and only a handful of institutions used a decentralized model. When considering the Carnegie Classification of the institution, the data revealed that a majority of masters institutions' define their organizational structure as centralized in contrast to a majority of doctoral/research schools who consider their fund raising programs to be hybrid. The study found that several institutional variables dealing with school size, scope of services, affiliation and classification can be identified as factors that seem to indicate among the institutions surveyed what type of organizational structure they utilize. The data revealed, in general, that schools organized with a centralized development model tend to be masters institutions and smaller than their hybrid counterparts in terms of enrollment, total giving, endowment and number of alumni.
520 $a The data also confirms that within a centralized fund raising organization, decision making for all key fund raising is controlled at the top of the organization by the central development operation, from the annual fund to soliciting major gifts to setting cultivation and solicitation policy. The survey data also revealed that in a majority of hybrid organized development operations, the central office remains in control of some aspects of the advancement operations.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Education, Finance. $3 1020300
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
690 $a 0277
690 $a 0745
710 2 0 $a Indiana University. $3 960096
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-08A.
790 1 0 $a Tempel, Eugene R., $e advisor
790 $a 0093
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3232573