東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Education for professional reasoning...

Stewart, Clea M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Education for professional reasoning in occupational therapy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Education for professional reasoning in occupational therapy./
作者:	Stewart, Clea M.
面頁冊數:	184 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-06, page: 2178.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International43-06.
標題:	Health Sciences, Education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MR00850
ISBN:	9780494008508

Education for professional reasoning in occupational therapy.
Stewart, Clea M.

Education for professional reasoning in occupational therapy. - 184 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-06, page: 2178.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--Dalhousie University (Canada), 2005.

Narrative inquiry---a qualitative study design---was used in order to guide the construction of a questionnaire and the gathering and analysis of practice narratives from 22 recently graduated therapists educated using either a problem based learning or a conventional curriculum. Results. Half of the therapists in the current study wrote narratives that had a balance of the four types of reasoning (narrative, procedural, interactive and conditional) thought to be used by expert reasoners in occupational therapy. The professional reasoning of the other therapists was more procedurally or diagnostically focused and did not seek to understand the client as an individual in the context of his or her occupational life story. Furthermore, in certain practice environments, despite the use of expert reasoning the stories told by occupational therapists did not always describe authentic practice. Educational background emerged as one of several factors that may influence the professional reasoning used by occupational therapists. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

ISBN: 9780494008508Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017921
Health Sciences, Education.

Education for professional reasoning in occupational therapy.
LDR:01898nmm 2200265 4500 001 1826157
005 20061218074255.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780494008508
035 $a (UnM)AAIMR00850
035 $a AAIMR00850
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Stewart, Clea M. $3 1915128
245 1 0 $a Education for professional reasoning in occupational therapy.
300 $a 184 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-06, page: 2178.
500 $a Adviser: Brenda Beagan.
502 $a Thesis (M.Sc.)--Dalhousie University (Canada), 2005.
520 $a Narrative inquiry---a qualitative study design---was used in order to guide the construction of a questionnaire and the gathering and analysis of practice narratives from 22 recently graduated therapists educated using either a problem based learning or a conventional curriculum. Results. Half of the therapists in the current study wrote narratives that had a balance of the four types of reasoning (narrative, procedural, interactive and conditional) thought to be used by expert reasoners in occupational therapy. The professional reasoning of the other therapists was more procedurally or diagnostically focused and did not seek to understand the client as an individual in the context of his or her occupational life story. Furthermore, in certain practice environments, despite the use of expert reasoning the stories told by occupational therapists did not always describe authentic practice. Educational background emerged as one of several factors that may influence the professional reasoning used by occupational therapists. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
590 $a School code: 0328.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Education. $3 1017921
690 $a 0350
710 2 0 $a Dalhousie University (Canada). $3 1017625
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 43-06.
790 1 0 $a Beagan, Brenda, $e advisor
790 $a 0328
791 $a M.Sc.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MR00850