東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Effect of content area reading strat...

Park, Travis Dale.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effect of content area reading strategy on achievement in secondary agriscience.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effect of content area reading strategy on achievement in secondary agriscience./
作者:	Park, Travis Dale.
面頁冊數:	388 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2070.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-06A.
標題:	Education, Agricultural. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3178018
ISBN:	9780542178429

Effect of content area reading strategy on achievement in secondary agriscience.
Park, Travis Dale.

Effect of content area reading strategy on achievement in secondary agriscience. - 388 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2070.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2005.

This study addressed improving agriscience students' comprehension by implementing content area reading strategies (CARS). Objectives included describing grade level, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), grade point average (GPA), and Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) reading levels of students, and describing variance in agriculture comprehension and motivation to read explained by these characteristics.

ISBN: 9780542178429Subjects--Topical Terms:

1022852
Education, Agricultural.

Effect of content area reading strategy on achievement in secondary agriscience.
LDR:03539nmm 2200361 4500 001 1823493
005 20061130142502.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542178429
035 $a (UnM)AAI3178018
035 $a AAI3178018
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Park, Travis Dale. $3 1912598
245 1 0 $a Effect of content area reading strategy on achievement in secondary agriscience.
300 $a 388 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2070.
500 $a Chair: Ed Osborne.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2005.
520 $a This study addressed improving agriscience students' comprehension by implementing content area reading strategies (CARS). Objectives included describing grade level, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), grade point average (GPA), and Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) reading levels of students, and describing variance in agriculture comprehension and motivation to read explained by these characteristics.
520 $a Hypotheses included students' (Ha1) comprehension of agricultural concepts and (Ha2) motivation to read will be significantly greater using CARS versus those using teacher's normal instruction. Questions leading qualitative inquiry included (1) how do agriculture teachers develop students' reading comprehension skills, (2) how do teachers implement CARS, and (3) what are the barriers to reading instruction?
520 $a Independent variables were CARS versus the teacher's normal instruction. Dependent variables were motivation to read and agriculture comprehension. Antecedent variables were gender, grade level, ethnicity, and SES. FCAT reading levels, GPA, and agriculture and motivation pre-tests were covariates.
520 $a A quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design determined the effect of implementing CARS on agricultural comprehension and attitude toward reading of a purposively selected sample (n = 95) of secondary agriscience students, enrolled in Agriscience Foundations in Florida. The study compared CARS instruction with the teacher's normal instruction.
520 $a Over 60% of students read at the lowest two FCAT reading levels, while 11.6% read at the highest two levels. Students were generally lacking in motivation to read. Agriculture pre-test score, grade level, GPA, gender, ethnicity, and FLAT reading level predicted 65.0% of variance in agriculture post-test scores. Regression analysis did not produce a model that was statistically significant for motivation to read. GPA and FCAT reading level predicted 39.4% of variance in the comprehension portion post-test score. Because the treatment effect produced no significant correlations and was not significant in explaining the variance in any of the models, MANCOVA and ANCOVA procedures were not conducted.
520 $a Prior to the study, agriscience teachers implemented few or no CARS. They possessed limited knowledge and confidence in using CARS. Teachers in the comparison group implemented twice as many strategies, yet their students arrived at nearly the same level of agricultural comprehension and motivation as students in the treatment group.
590 $a School code: 0070.
650 4 $a Education, Agricultural. $3 1022852
650 4 $a Education, Reading. $3 1017790
650 4 $a Education, Vocational. $3 1017499
650 4 $a Education, Secondary. $3 539262
690 $a 0517
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0747
690 $a 0533
710 2 0 $a University of Florida. $3 718949
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-06A.
790 1 0 $a Osborne, Ed, $e advisor
790 $a 0070
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3178018