東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Semantic versus phonological aphasia...

Ennis, Methlee Richardson.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Semantic versus phonological aphasia treatments for anomia: A within-subject experimental design.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Semantic versus phonological aphasia treatments for anomia: A within-subject experimental design./
作者:	Ennis, Methlee Richardson.
面頁冊數:	110 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-12, Section: B, page: 6061.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International60-12B.
標題:	Health Sciences, Speech Pathology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9956572
ISBN:	0599597224

Semantic versus phonological aphasia treatments for anomia: A within-subject experimental design.
Ennis, Methlee Richardson.

Semantic versus phonological aphasia treatments for anomia: A within-subject experimental design. - 110 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-12, Section: B, page: 6061.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 1999.

Word retrieval impairments (anomia) may relate to dysfunction of either semantic or phonological stages of lexical processing. Recent clinical work guided by neuropsychological perspective has led researchers to apply semantic and phonological treatments for word retrieval impairments to target the presumed stages of (processing) dysfunction. Some evidence suggests that there is no one-to-one correspondence between the most effective treatment and the type of word retrieval impairment. However, few studies have contrasted different treatments in the same patients. We describe the effects of word retrieval treatments in four aphasic subjects. Each subject participated in two treatments, which incorporated a within-subject crossover experimental design with multiple baselines across subjects and behaviors. The two treatments utilized yes/no questioning that focused on semantic versus phonological judgments about stimuli in hopes that making these decisions would enable the subject to more accurately name the stimuli aloud. We predicted that these treatments would be beneficial to the experimental subjects, that the subjects would differ in the relative responsiveness to the two treatments, and that the direction of that differential might be explained by differences in the nature of their lexical deficits. The conclusions of this study were the following: (a) The treatments were effective, and effects were maintained. (b) The treatments were differentially effective, and these differences appeared related to the nature of each subject's lexical deficit(s) and spared processes.

ISBN: 0599597224Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018105
Health Sciences, Speech Pathology.

Semantic versus phonological aphasia treatments for anomia: A within-subject experimental design.
LDR:02524nmm 2200277 4500 001 1817574
005 20060814144818.5
008 130610s1999 eng d
020 $a 0599597224
035 $a (UnM)AAI9956572
035 $a AAI9956572
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Ennis, Methlee Richardson. $3 1906923
245 1 0 $a Semantic versus phonological aphasia treatments for anomia: A within-subject experimental design.
300 $a 110 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-12, Section: B, page: 6061.
500 $a Chair: Leslie J. Gonzalez Rothi.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 1999.
520 $a Word retrieval impairments (anomia) may relate to dysfunction of either semantic or phonological stages of lexical processing. Recent clinical work guided by neuropsychological perspective has led researchers to apply semantic and phonological treatments for word retrieval impairments to target the presumed stages of (processing) dysfunction. Some evidence suggests that there is no one-to-one correspondence between the most effective treatment and the type of word retrieval impairment. However, few studies have contrasted different treatments in the same patients. We describe the effects of word retrieval treatments in four aphasic subjects. Each subject participated in two treatments, which incorporated a within-subject crossover experimental design with multiple baselines across subjects and behaviors. The two treatments utilized yes/no questioning that focused on semantic versus phonological judgments about stimuli in hopes that making these decisions would enable the subject to more accurately name the stimuli aloud. We predicted that these treatments would be beneficial to the experimental subjects, that the subjects would differ in the relative responsiveness to the two treatments, and that the direction of that differential might be explained by differences in the nature of their lexical deficits. The conclusions of this study were the following: (a) The treatments were effective, and effects were maintained. (b) The treatments were differentially effective, and these differences appeared related to the nature of each subject's lexical deficit(s) and spared processes.
590 $a School code: 0070.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Speech Pathology. $3 1018105
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
690 $a 0460
690 $a 0633
710 2 0 $a University of Florida. $3 718949
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 60-12B.
790 1 0 $a Rothi, Leslie J. Gonzalez, $e advisor
790 $a 0070
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1999
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9956572