東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

School search and seizure law: A gui...

Frandsen, Scott.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

School search and seizure law: A guideline for K-12 administrators.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	School search and seizure law: A guideline for K-12 administrators./
作者:	Frandsen, Scott.
面頁冊數:	103 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 2836.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-08A.
標題:	Education, Higher Education Administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3420103
ISBN:	9781124152691

School search and seizure law: A guideline for K-12 administrators.
Frandsen, Scott.

School search and seizure law: A guideline for K-12 administrators. - 103 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 2836.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Mercer University, 2010.

In an effort to safeguard the learning environment, school administrators generally rely on district or local school guidelines and professional judgment. With new technology, the proliferation of drug use, and increased school violence, schools have become a complex environment to manage for both system and local leadership. Administrators are often called on to deal with situations that require them to search students and their belongings. School system officials and/or local school administrators are breaching students' constitutional rights and, in many cases, facing litigation when attempting to safeguard the learning environment through improper search and seizure practices and/or policies. The purpose of this research is to inform and provide guidance to school officials on researched-based search and seizure practices that will allow them to search students and their belongings properly and in a manner that safeguards the rights of the students they are searching.

ISBN: 9781124152691Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669382
Education, Higher Education Administration.

School search and seizure law: A guideline for K-12 administrators.
LDR:03080nam 2200301 4500 001 1401807
005 20111017130539.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124152691
035 $a (UMI)AAI3420103
035 $a AAI3420103
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Frandsen, Scott. $3 1680963
245 1 0 $a School search and seizure law: A guideline for K-12 administrators.
300 $a 103 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 2836.
500 $a Adviser: Kevin Jenkins.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Mercer University, 2010.
520 $a In an effort to safeguard the learning environment, school administrators generally rely on district or local school guidelines and professional judgment. With new technology, the proliferation of drug use, and increased school violence, schools have become a complex environment to manage for both system and local leadership. Administrators are often called on to deal with situations that require them to search students and their belongings. School system officials and/or local school administrators are breaching students' constitutional rights and, in many cases, facing litigation when attempting to safeguard the learning environment through improper search and seizure practices and/or policies. The purpose of this research is to inform and provide guidance to school officials on researched-based search and seizure practices that will allow them to search students and their belongings properly and in a manner that safeguards the rights of the students they are searching.
520 $a This study reviews the historical context of students' rights as it relates to search and seizure through an overview of existing case law, including relevant Supreme Court cases, lower federal courts cases, case briefs and information from law and education journals. This study also provides an in-depth analysis of the recent U.S. Supreme Court case Safford v. Redding and its impact on search and seizure law. This analysis revealed that school officials must have reasonable information that leads to the necessary suspicion to initiate the search. The scope of the search cannot be overly intrusive given the circumstances, which include the age and sex of the student. Additionally, under the "quantum leap" doctrine of the U.S. Supreme Court articulated in Safford v. Redding, highly intrusive strip searches should only be conducted given the threat of danger or given specific information that indicates contraband is hidden under clothing. Further research is suggested to identify the communication and training practices of school systems regarding search and seizure policies and the effectiveness of those practices in developing an awareness of ever evolving school law.
590 $a School code: 1160.
650 4 $a Education, Higher Education Administration. $3 1669382
650 4 $a Education, Leadership. $3 1035576
650 4 $a Education, Secondary. $3 539262
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0533
710 2 $a Mercer University. $3 1265016
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-08A.
790 1 0 $a Jenkins, Kevin, $e advisor
790 $a 1160
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3420103