東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Agendas, gender, and audience: The d...

Fife, Ernelle.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Agendas, gender, and audience: The discourse of eighteenth-century illness narratives.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Agendas, gender, and audience: The discourse of eighteenth-century illness narratives./
作者:	Fife, Ernelle.
面頁冊數:	270 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-11, Section: A, page: 4405.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International56-11A.
標題:	Language, Modern. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9608503

Agendas, gender, and audience: The discourse of eighteenth-century illness narratives.
Fife, Ernelle.

Agendas, gender, and audience: The discourse of eighteenth-century illness narratives. - 270 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-11, Section: A, page: 4405.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgia State University, 1995.

Both individual doctors and medical schools are beginning to emphasize the importance of better communication between doctor and patient. One way of improving communication skills is to learn the language of medicine. But doctors and patients have two distinct discourses, characterized by more than just differences in vocabulary, and both must be studied within the context of an illness. Twentieth-century doctors' language is linear discourse and dates back to the seventeenth century, when it was referred to as masculine or public discourse. This language is concise, objective, with concrete nouns, data, numbers and measurements, and is limited to a specific disease. Twentieth-century patients' language is circular discourse, and in the eighteenth century was usually referred to as feminine or private. It is diffuse, subjective, full of imagery, metaphor and stories within stories, and rarely limited to just the disease. Both discourses are equally valid in describing illness. Throughout the eighteenth century doctors and male midwives used linear discourse, while patients and female midwives used circular discourse. The differences in these illness narratives are a basis for a course in medicine and literature; such a study of illness narratives or stories could help pre-medical students or medical students to better understand patients' stories of disease.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018098
Language, Modern.

Agendas, gender, and audience: The discourse of eighteenth-century illness narratives.
LDR:02315nam 2200301 4500 001 1398326
005 20110908142957.5
008 130515s1995 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI9608503
035 $a AAI9608503
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Fife, Ernelle. $3 1677206
245 1 0 $a Agendas, gender, and audience: The discourse of eighteenth-century illness narratives.
300 $a 270 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-11, Section: A, page: 4405.
500 $a Chair: Christine Gallant.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgia State University, 1995.
520 $a Both individual doctors and medical schools are beginning to emphasize the importance of better communication between doctor and patient. One way of improving communication skills is to learn the language of medicine. But doctors and patients have two distinct discourses, characterized by more than just differences in vocabulary, and both must be studied within the context of an illness. Twentieth-century doctors' language is linear discourse and dates back to the seventeenth century, when it was referred to as masculine or public discourse. This language is concise, objective, with concrete nouns, data, numbers and measurements, and is limited to a specific disease. Twentieth-century patients' language is circular discourse, and in the eighteenth century was usually referred to as feminine or private. It is diffuse, subjective, full of imagery, metaphor and stories within stories, and rarely limited to just the disease. Both discourses are equally valid in describing illness. Throughout the eighteenth century doctors and male midwives used linear discourse, while patients and female midwives used circular discourse. The differences in these illness narratives are a basis for a course in medicine and literature; such a study of illness narratives or stories could help pre-medical students or medical students to better understand patients' stories of disease.
590 $a School code: 0079.
650 4 $a Language, Modern. $3 1018098
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Education. $3 1017921
650 4 $a Women's Studies. $3 1017481
650 4 $a History of Science. $3 896972
650 4 $a Literature, English. $3 1017709
690 $a 0291
690 $a 0350
690 $a 0453
690 $a 0585
690 $a 0593
710 2 $a Georgia State University. $3 1018518
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 56-11A.
790 1 0 $a Gallant, Christine, $e advisor
790 $a 0079
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1995
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9608503